Department of Psychology, University of Washington, 3909 Stevens Way NE Campus Box 351525, Seattle, WA, 98195-1525, USA.
Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
AIDS Behav. 2019 Aug;23(8):2185-2189. doi: 10.1007/s10461-018-02387-3.
"Debrief reports" (DRs) use structured forms to capture key concepts from in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. They are completed by interviewers and rapidly disseminated to key team members to facilitate identification of potential problems with study procedures, recruitment, or participant engagement and to inform critical adjustments, which can be especially pertinent in intervention studies. Their reliability and validity have yet to be formally evaluated. To assess the accuracy of DRs in capturing key content, raters analyzed a random sub-sample of 20 pairs of de-identified transcripts and their linked DRs from the VOICE-D trial. Analyses generally supported the accuracy of DRs; however, pertinent information from transcripts was occasionally missed or recorded with discrepancies or lack of detail. Longer transcripts and DR sections describing complex topic areas were more likely to involve discrepancies. Recommendations are offered for further research and optimizing the use of DRs.
“汇报报告”（DR）使用结构化表格来捕捉深入访谈和焦点小组讨论中的关键概念。由访谈者完成，并迅速分发给主要团队成员，以方便识别研究程序、招募或参与者参与方面的潜在问题，并提供信息以进行关键调整，这在干预研究中尤为重要。然而，它们的可靠性和有效性尚未经过正式评估。为了评估 DR 在捕捉关键内容方面的准确性，评估者分析了来自 VOICE-D 试验的 20 对匿名转录本及其相关 DR 的随机子样本。分析结果普遍支持 DR 的准确性；然而，转录本中的相关信息偶尔会被遗漏或记录存在差异或缺乏细节。较长的转录本和描述复杂主题领域的 DR 部分更有可能存在差异。为进一步研究和优化 DR 的使用提供了建议。
