• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为新的下肢假肢使用者开发用于假肢设计的患者共同决策辅助工具并进行alpha测试。

Development and alpha testing of a patient shared decision aid for prosthesis design for new lower limb prosthesis users.

作者信息

Anderson Chelsey B, Fatone Stefania, Mañago Mark M, Swink Laura A, Kittelson Andrew J, Magnusson Dawn M, Christiansen Cory L

机构信息

Physical Therapy Program, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO.

Department of Research, Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora, CO.

出版信息

Prosthet Orthot Int. 2024 Oct 1;48(5):565-573. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000314. Epub 2024 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1097/PXR.0000000000000314
PMID:38506643
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11411013/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

After lower limb amputation, several prosthesis design options exist. However, prosthesis design decisions do not always reflect a prosthesis user's needs, values, and preferences.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a patient decision aid (PDA) prototype for prosthetists and new prosthesis users facing prosthesis design decisions after lower limb amputation, and to assess its usability, accuracy, and comprehensibility.

STUDY DESIGN

Exploratory mixed methods.

METHODS

PDA development was informed by a qualitative needs assessment and guided by the International Patient Decision Aid Standards. The PDA was evaluated by steering groups of experienced prosthesis users and prosthetic professionals (prosthetists and researchers) to test usability, accuracy, and comprehensibility through focus groups, individual interviews, and rating on a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 10.

RESULTS

The resulting PDA included 6 sections: (1) Amputation and Early Recovery, (2) Communication, (3) Values, (4) Prosthesis Design, (5) Preferences, and (6) Prosthetic Journey. Usability, accuracy, and comprehensibility were rated as 9.2, 9.6, and 9.6, respectively, by prosthetic professionals, and 9.4, 9.6, and 9.6, respectively, by prosthesis users.

DISCUSSION

The PDA incorporated guidance by relevant stakeholders and was rated favorably, emphasizing a need for shared decision-making support in prosthesis design. One challenge was determining the amount of information in the PDA, highlighting the diversity in end users' informational needs. Future iterations of the PDA should undergo beta testing in clinical settings.

CONCLUSIONS

A standardized, iterative method was used to develop a PDA for new lower limb prosthesis users and prosthetists when considering prosthesis design decisions. The PDA was considered useable, accurate, and comprehensible.

摘要

背景

下肢截肢后,存在多种假肢设计方案。然而,假肢设计决策并不总是能反映假肢使用者的需求、价值观和偏好。

目的

为面临下肢截肢后假肢设计决策的假肢师和新假肢使用者开发一种患者决策辅助工具(PDA)原型,并评估其可用性、准确性和可理解性。

研究设计

探索性混合方法。

方法

通过定性需求评估为PDA的开发提供信息,并以国际患者决策辅助工具标准为指导。由经验丰富的假肢使用者和假肢专业人员(假肢师和研究人员)组成的指导小组对PDA进行评估,通过焦点小组、个人访谈以及1至10的李克特量表评分来测试其可用性、准确性和可理解性。

结果

最终的PDA包括6个部分:(1)截肢与早期康复,(2)沟通,(3)价值观,(4)假肢设计,(5)偏好,以及(6)假肢历程。假肢专业人员对可用性、准确性和可理解性的评分分别为9.2、9.6和9.6,假肢使用者的评分分别为9.4、9.6和9.6。

讨论

该PDA纳入了相关利益相关者的指导意见,且评价良好,强调了在假肢设计中需要共享决策支持。一个挑战是确定PDA中的信息量,这突出了终端用户信息需求的多样性。PDA的未来迭代版本应在临床环境中进行测试。

结论

采用标准化的迭代方法为新的下肢假肢使用者和假肢师在考虑假肢设计决策时开发了一种PDA。该PDA被认为是可用的、准确的且可理解的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80bc/11411013/8518773717ba/nihms-1946677-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80bc/11411013/bd757665f229/nihms-1946677-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80bc/11411013/8518773717ba/nihms-1946677-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80bc/11411013/bd757665f229/nihms-1946677-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80bc/11411013/8518773717ba/nihms-1946677-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and alpha testing of a patient shared decision aid for prosthesis design for new lower limb prosthesis users.为新的下肢假肢使用者开发用于假肢设计的患者共同决策辅助工具并进行alpha测试。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2024 Oct 1;48(5):565-573. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000314. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
2
Experiences of persons with lower limb amputation after prosthetic rehabilitation in Ghana: A qualitative inquiry.加纳下肢截肢者在假肢康复后的体验:一项定性研究。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2024 Jun 1;48(3):329-336. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000264. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
3
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
4
How To Improve Patient Selection in Individuals With Lower Extremity Amputation Using a Bone-anchored Prosthesis.如何使用骨锚式假肢改善下肢截肢患者的患者选择
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 24. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003369.
5
Does Transhumeral Osseointegration After Amputation Improve Patient-reported Outcomes and Prosthesis Use?截肢后经肱骨骨整合是否能改善患者报告的结局及假肢使用情况?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 19. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003420.
6
The effect of cognitive impairment on prosthesis use in older adults who underwent amputation due to vascular-related etiology: A systematic review of the literature.认知障碍对因血管相关病因接受截肢手术的老年人使用假肢的影响:文献系统综述
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018 Apr;42(2):144-152. doi: 10.1177/0309364617695883. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
7
Colorado Limb Donning-Timed Up and Go (COLD-TUG) Test in Lower-Extremity Amputation: Less Donning Time with Osseointegrated Bone-Anchored Prosthetic Limb.下肢截肢患者的科罗拉多肢体穿戴-计时起立行走(COLD-TUG)测试:骨整合式骨锚定假肢的穿戴时间更短
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2025 May 13;107(14):1611-1619. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.24.00871.
8
What Are the Factors Associated With Revision Surgery on the Residual Limb and Functional Results in Patients With Posttraumatic Lower Limb Amputations?创伤后下肢截肢患者残肢翻修手术及功能结果的相关因素有哪些?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 1;483(3):501-510. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003251. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
9
Developing an Individualized Patient Decision Aid for Chronic Coronary Disease Based on the ISCHEMIA Trial: A Mixed-Methods Study.基于 ISCHEMIA 试验制定慢性冠心病个体化患者决策辅助工具:一项混合方法研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024 Oct;17(10):e010923. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.010923. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
10
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5(10):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving shared decision-making for prosthetic care: A qualitative needs assessment of prosthetists and new lower-limb prosthesis users.改善假肢护理的共同决策:对假肢技师和新的下肢假肢使用者的定性需求评估。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2023 Feb 1;47(1):26-42. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000142. Epub 2022 May 25.
2
Understanding decision-making in prosthetic rehabilitation by prosthetists and people with lower limb amputation: a qualitative study.通过假肢矫形师和下肢截肢者了解假肢康复决策:一项定性研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Feb;45(4):723-732. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2037745. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
3
Development of a patient decision aid for patients with breast cancer who consider immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy.
开发一种适用于考虑在乳房切除术后立即进行乳房重建的乳腺癌患者的患者决策辅助工具。
Health Expect. 2022 Feb;25(1):232-244. doi: 10.1111/hex.13368. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
4
Patient Roadmaps for Chronic Illness: Introducing a New Approach for Fostering Patient-Centered Care.慢性病患者路线图:引入一种促进以患者为中心的护理的新方法。
MDM Policy Pract. 2021 Jul 2;6(1):23814683211019947. doi: 10.1177/23814683211019947. eCollection 2021 Jan-Jun.
5
Systematic Development of Patient Decision Aids: An Update from the IPDAS Collaboration.系统开发患者决策辅助工具:来自 IPDAS 合作组织的最新更新。
Med Decis Making. 2021 Oct;41(7):736-754. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211014163. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
6
The Development and Usability of the AMPREDICT Decision Support Tool: A Mixed Methods Study.AMPREDICT 决策支持工具的开发与可用性:混合方法研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Aug;62(2):304-311. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.03.031. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
7
20th Anniversary Ottawa Decision Support Framework: Part 3 Overview of Systematic Reviews and Updated Framework.第 20 届渥太华决策支持框架周年纪念:第 3 部分 系统评价概述和更新框架。
Med Decis Making. 2020 Apr;40(3):379-398. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20911870.
8
Beyond Oncology: Question Prompt Lists in Healthcare-A Scoping Review Protocol.肿瘤学之外:医疗保健中的问题提示清单——一项范围综述方案
Methods Protoc. 2020 Jan 16;3(1):9. doi: 10.3390/mps3010009.
9
Debrief Reports to Expedite the Impact of Qualitative Research: Do They Accurately Capture Data from In-depth Interviews?汇报总结可加速定性研究的影响:它们能准确捕捉深度访谈中的数据吗?
AIDS Behav. 2019 Aug;23(8):2185-2189. doi: 10.1007/s10461-018-02387-3.
10
Prosthesis satisfaction in lower limb amputees: A systematic review of associated factors and questionnaires.下肢截肢者的假肢满意度:相关因素及问卷的系统评价
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(39):e12296. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012296.