Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Adv Nutr. 2019 Mar 1;10(2):351-359. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmy075.
Many nutrition programs include classroom-based education. Schoolteachers are relied upon to deliver these programs despite gaps in nutrition education motivation, knowledge, and self-efficacy. Teacher professional development (PD) for these nutrition education programs has been identified as a strategy for improving program effectiveness, yet many interventions do not include a PD component and still fewer describe it. A literature search was conducted between January and February 2017; articles were collected from PubMed, ERIC, and EBSCOhost. Article inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) published in an English-language peer-reviewed or scholarly journal, 2) published after 2000, 3) empirical research, 4) research conducted in a K-12 classroom, 5) research included nutrition education component, and 6) program delivered by a classroom teacher. Twenty-seven interventions were identified. A team of 2 researchers performed content analysis based on an evidence-based set of 7 PD components to assess if and how these components were incorporated before, during, or after program implementation. Little information was provided that described the role of teacher PD in the course of delivering nutrition education in classroom-based programs. The most common elements of PD described in the literature were the time spent in PD and follow-up with instructors during or after program implementation. There was a notable lack of methodologic description of teacher PD, and this limited reporting may decrease researchers' ability to work with teachers in a consistent and effective manner.
许多营养计划都包括课堂教育。尽管教师在营养教育动机、知识和自我效能方面存在差距,但仍依赖学校教师来实施这些计划。针对这些营养教育计划的教师专业发展(PD)已被确定为提高计划效果的策略,但许多干预措施没有包括 PD 部分,更少的干预措施对其进行描述。2017 年 1 月至 2 月进行了文献检索;文章从 PubMed、ERIC 和 EBSCOhost 收集。文章纳入标准如下:1)发表在英语同行评议或学术期刊上,2)发表于 2000 年后,3)实证研究,4)在 K-12 课堂进行的研究,5)研究包括营养教育部分,6)由课堂教师实施的计划。确定了 27 项干预措施。一个由 2 名研究人员组成的团队根据一套基于证据的 7 个 PD 组成部分进行内容分析,以评估这些组成部分是否以及如何在计划实施之前、期间或之后被纳入。几乎没有提供描述教师 PD 在课堂为基础的营养教育计划实施过程中的作用的信息。文献中描述的 PD 的最常见要素是在 PD 中花费的时间以及在计划实施期间或之后与教师的后续联系。教师 PD 的方法描述明显缺乏,这种有限的报告可能会降低研究人员以一致和有效的方式与教师合作的能力。