Gilbert W M, Nicolaides K H, Sel T, Campbell S
Harris-Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
J Ultrasound Med. 1988 Oct;7(10):549-51. doi: 10.7863/jum.1988.7.10.549.
This study examines four methods, automated and manual, of calculating the pulsatility index (PI) of fetal umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms (FVW) and compares these values to the resistance index (RI), the A/B ratio, and the degree of absence of end diastolic frequencies. The FVWs were obtained by the Doptek continuous wave Doppler ultrasound. All of the maximum envelope indices had significant correlations; a highly significant difference was found between the automated and the manual methods of determining PI. When PI was measured manually, there was a better correlation between the A/B ratio, RI, and degree of absence of end diastolic frequencies than when the automated methods were used.
本研究考察了计算胎儿脐动脉血流速度波形(FVW)搏动指数(PI)的四种方法,即自动法和手动法,并将这些值与阻力指数(RI)、A/B比值以及舒张末期频率缺失程度进行比较。FVW通过多谱勒连续波多普勒超声获得。所有最大包络指数均具有显著相关性;在自动和手动测定PI的方法之间发现了高度显著差异。当手动测量PI时,与使用自动方法相比,A/B比值、RI和舒张末期频率缺失程度之间具有更好的相关性。