van Vugt J M, Ruissen C J, Nienhuis S J, Hoogland H J, de Haan J
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J Clin Ultrasound. 1988 Oct;16(8):573-6. doi: 10.1002/jcu.1870160807.
A comparison was made between the AB ratio, resistance index (RI), and pulsatility index (PI), calculated from tracings obtained by pulsed Doppler (PD) and continuous wave (CW) Doppler devices in 14 uncomplicated singleton pregnancies. The AB ratio, RI, and PI were a slightly higher for the CW Doppler compared to the PD system, although not significantly (p = 0.18, p = 0.21, and p = 0.44, respectively). The difference in signal to noise ratio (S/N ratio) between the PD and CW Doppler systems was felt to be the reason for the discrepancy in the calculated velocity waveform indices.
对14例单胎妊娠无并发症孕妇使用脉冲多普勒(PD)和连续波(CW)多普勒设备获取的描记图计算得出的AB比值、阻力指数(RI)和搏动指数(PI)进行了比较。与PD系统相比,CW多普勒的AB比值、RI和PI略高,但差异无统计学意义(p分别为0.18、0.21和0.44)。PD和CW多普勒系统之间的信噪比(S/N比)差异被认为是计算出的速度波形指数存在差异的原因。