Musculoskeletal Sciences and Sport Medicine Research Centre, Manchester Metropolitan University, Crewe CW1 5DU, UK.
Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK.
Nutrients. 2019 Jan 18;11(1):195. doi: 10.3390/nu11010195.
This study took a multi-analytical approach including group differences, correlations and unit-weighed directional z-score comparisons to identify the key mediators of bone health. A total of 190 participants (18⁻80 years) were categorized by body fat%, body mass index (BMI) and fat mass index (FMI) to examine the effect of differing obesity criteria on bone characteristics. A subset of 50 healthy-eating middle-to-older aged adults (44⁻80 years) was randomly selected to examine any added impact of lifestyle and inflammatory profiles. Diet was assessed using a 3-day food diary, bone mineral density (BMD) and content (BMC) by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in the lumbar, thoracic, (upper and lower) appendicular and pelvic areas. Physical activity was assessed using the Baecke questionnaire, and endocrine profiling was assessed using multiplex luminometry. Obesity, classed via BMI, positively affected 20 out of 22 BMC- and BMD-related outcome measures, whereas FMI was associated with 14 outcome measures and adiposity only modulated nine out of 22 BMC- and BMD-related outcome measures. Whilst bivariate correlations only linked vitamin A and relative protein intake with BMD, the Z-score composite summary presented a significantly different overall dietary quality between healthy and osteopenic individuals. In addition, bivariate correlations from the subset revealed daily energy intake, sport-based physical activity and BMI positive mediators of seven out of 10 BMD sites with age and body fat% shown to be negative mediators of bone characteristics. In conclusion, whilst BMI is a good indicator of bone characteristics, high body fat% should also be the focus of osteoporosis risk with ageing. Interestingly, high BMI in conjunction with moderate to vigorous activity supplemented with an optimal diet (quality and quantity) are identified as positive modulators of bone heath.
本研究采用了多分析方法,包括组间差异、相关性和单位加权定向 z 分数比较,以确定骨骼健康的关键介导因素。总共 190 名参与者(18-80 岁)根据体脂肪%、体重指数(BMI)和脂肪量指数(FMI)进行分类,以检查不同肥胖标准对骨骼特征的影响。随机选择了 50 名健康饮食的中老年成年人(44-80 岁)的亚组,以检查生活方式和炎症特征是否有任何附加影响。饮食使用 3 天食物日记进行评估,腰椎、胸椎、(上下)附肢和骨盆区域的骨矿物质密度(BMD)和骨矿物质含量(BMC)通过双能 X 射线吸收法进行评估。身体活动使用 Baecke 问卷进行评估,内分泌特征使用多重发光法进行评估。肥胖通过 BMI 进行分类,与 22 个 BMC 和 BMD 相关结果测量中的 20 个呈正相关,而 FMI 与 14 个结果测量相关,脂肪量仅调节 22 个 BMC 和 BMD 相关结果测量中的 9 个。虽然双变量相关性仅将维生素 A 和相对蛋白质摄入量与 BMD 相关联,但 Z 分数综合摘要显示健康和骨质疏松个体之间的整体饮食质量存在显著差异。此外,子集中的双变量相关性表明,每日能量摄入、基于运动的身体活动和 BMI 是 10 个 BMD 部位中的 7 个的阳性调节因素,而年龄和体脂肪%则显示为骨骼特征的阴性调节因素。总之,虽然 BMI 是骨骼特征的良好指标,但随着年龄的增长,高体脂肪%也应成为骨质疏松风险的关注点。有趣的是,高 BMI 与适度至剧烈活动相结合,并辅以最佳饮食(质量和数量),被确定为骨骼健康的正调节剂。