• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于数据的遗忘型轻度认知障碍患者认知轨迹的预后特征。

Data-driven prognostic features of cognitive trajectories in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairments.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.

Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Ilwon-dong, Kangnam-ku, Seoul, 135-710, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Alzheimers Res Ther. 2019 Jan 22;11(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13195-018-0462-z.

DOI:10.1186/s13195-018-0462-z
PMID:30670089
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6343354/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) is generally considered to be a prodromal stage of Alzheimer's disease, patients with aMCI show heterogeneous patterns of progression. Moreover, there are few studies investigating data-driven cognitive trajectory in aMCI. We therefore classified patients with aMCI based on their cognitive trajectory, measured by clinical dementia rating sum of boxes (CDR-SOB). Then, we compared the clinical and neuroimaging features among groups classified by cognitive trajectory.

METHODS

We retrospectively recruited 278 patients with aMCI who underwent three or more timepoints of neuropsychological testing. They also had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including structured three-dimensional volume images. Cortical thickness was measured using surface-based methods. We performed trajectory analyses to classify our aMCI patients according to their progression and investigate their cognitive trajectory using CDR-SOB.

RESULTS

Trajectory analyses showed that patients with aMCI were divided into three groups: stable (61.8%), slow decliner (31.7%), and fast decliner (6.5%). Changes throughout a mean follow-up duration of 3.7 years in the CDR-SOB for the subgroups of stable/slow/fast decliners were 1.3-, 6.4-, and 12-point increases, respectively. Decliners were older and carried apolipoprotein E4 (APOE4) genotypes more frequently than stable patients. Compared with the stable group, decliners showed a higher frequency of aMCI patients with both visual and verbal memory dysfunction, late stage aMCI, and multiple domain dysfunction. In addition, compared with the stable group, the slow decliners showed cortical thinning predominantly in bilateral parietotemporal areas, while the fast decliners showed cortical thinning predominantly in bilateral frontotemporal areas. Both decliner groups showed worse cognitive function in attention, language, visuospatial, memory, and frontal/executive domains than the stable group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data-driven trajectory analysis provides new insights into heterogeneous cognitive trajectories of aMCI and further suggests that baseline clinical and neuroimaging profiles might predict aMCI patients with poor prognosis.

摘要

背景

虽然遗忘型轻度认知障碍(aMCI)通常被认为是阿尔茨海默病的前驱阶段,但 aMCI 患者的进展模式存在异质性。此外,很少有研究调查 aMCI 中数据驱动的认知轨迹。因此,我们根据临床痴呆评定量表总和分(CDR-SOB)测量的认知轨迹对 aMCI 患者进行分类,然后比较按认知轨迹分类的组之间的临床和神经影像学特征。

方法

我们回顾性招募了 278 名接受了三次或更多次神经心理学测试的 aMCI 患者。他们还接受了包括结构三维容积图像在内的磁共振成像(MRI)检查。使用基于表面的方法测量皮质厚度。我们进行轨迹分析,根据患者的进展情况对 aMCI 患者进行分类,并使用 CDR-SOB 研究他们的认知轨迹。

结果

轨迹分析显示,aMCI 患者分为三组:稳定组(61.8%)、缓慢下降组(31.7%)和快速下降组(6.5%)。在稳定/缓慢/快速下降亚组中,CDR-SOB 的平均随访时间为 3.7 年,其变化分别为 1.3、6.4 和 12 个点的增加。下降组患者年龄较大,携带载脂蛋白 E4(APOE4)基因型的频率也较高。与稳定组相比,下降组患者中视觉和语言记忆功能障碍、晚期 aMCI 和多域功能障碍的 aMCI 患者比例更高。此外,与稳定组相比,缓慢下降组患者双侧顶颞区皮质变薄更为明显,而快速下降组患者双侧额颞区皮质变薄更为明显。与稳定组相比,下降组患者在注意力、语言、视空间、记忆和额叶/执行域的认知功能更差。

结论

我们的数据驱动轨迹分析为 aMCI 的异质认知轨迹提供了新的见解,并进一步表明基线临床和神经影像学特征可能预测预后不良的 aMCI 患者。

相似文献

1
Data-driven prognostic features of cognitive trajectories in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairments.基于数据的遗忘型轻度认知障碍患者认知轨迹的预后特征。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2019 Jan 22;11(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13195-018-0462-z.
2
Frontal-executive dysfunction affects dementia conversion in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment.额皮质执行功能障碍影响遗忘型轻度认知障碍患者向痴呆的转化。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 21;10(1):772. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-57525-6.
3
Clinical relevance of amnestic versus non-amnestic mild cognitive impairment subtyping in Parkinson's disease.遗忘型与非遗忘型轻度认知障碍亚组在帕金森病中的临床相关性。
Eur J Neurol. 2019 May;26(5):766-773. doi: 10.1111/ene.13886. Epub 2019 Jan 20.
4
Prediction Models of Cognitive Trajectories in Patients with Nonamnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment.非遗忘型轻度认知障碍患者认知轨迹的预测模型。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 11;8(1):10468. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28881-1.
5
Effects of education on the progression of early- versus late-stage mild cognitive impairment.教育对早期和晚期轻度认知障碍进展的影响。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 Apr;25(4):597-606. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212002001. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
6
Tracking Cognitive Decline in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Early-Stage Alzheimer Dementia: Mini-Mental State Examination versus Neuropsychological Battery.追踪遗忘型轻度认知障碍和早期阿尔茨海默病痴呆的认知衰退:简易精神状态检查表与神经心理成套测验的比较
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2017;44(1-2):105-117. doi: 10.1159/000478520. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
7
Cognitive and imaging markers in non-demented subjects attending a memory clinic: study design and baseline findings of the MEMENTO cohort.记忆门诊非痴呆受试者的认知与影像学标志物:MEMENTO队列研究设计与基线结果
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2017 Aug 29;9(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13195-017-0288-0.
8
Neuroimaging basis in the conversion of aMCI patients with APOE-ε4 to AD: study protocol of a prospective diagnostic trial.载脂蛋白E-ε4基因携带者轻度认知障碍患者向阿尔茨海默病转化的神经影像学基础:一项前瞻性诊断试验的研究方案
BMC Neurol. 2016 May 12;16:64. doi: 10.1186/s12883-016-0587-2.
9
Clinical Effects of Frontal Behavioral Impairment: Cortical Thickness and Cognitive Decline in Individuals with Subjective Cognitive Decline and Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment.额部行为障碍的临床影响:主观认知下降和遗忘型轻度认知障碍个体的皮质厚度与认知下降。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;69(1):213-225. doi: 10.3233/JAD-190007.
10
Cognitive Trajectories and Associated Biomarkers in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment.轻度认知障碍患者的认知轨迹及相关生物标志物
J Alzheimers Dis. 2023;92(3):803-814. doi: 10.3233/JAD-220326.

引用本文的文献

1
Individualized and Biomarker-Based Prognosis of Longitudinal Cognitive Decline in Early Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease.早期有症状阿尔茨海默病纵向认知衰退的个体化及基于生物标志物的预后
J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2024 Sep 27;8(1):1301-1315. doi: 10.3233/ADR-240049. eCollection 2024.
2
Characterizing the clinical heterogeneity of early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease: a data-driven machine learning approach.表征早期症状性阿尔茨海默病的临床异质性:一种数据驱动的机器学习方法。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2024 Aug 12;16:1410544. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1410544. eCollection 2024.
3
Mapping the long-term delayed recall-based cortex-hippocampus network constrained by the structural and functional connectome: a case-control multimodal MRI study.

本文引用的文献

1
Prediction Models of Cognitive Trajectories in Patients with Nonamnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment.非遗忘型轻度认知障碍患者认知轨迹的预测模型。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 11;8(1):10468. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28881-1.
2
Prediction Model of Conversion to Dementia Risk in Subjects with Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Longitudinal, Multi-Center Clinic-Based Study.遗忘型轻度认知障碍患者向痴呆转化风险的预测模型:一项基于纵向、多中心临床的研究。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;60(4):1579-1587. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170507.
3
Comparison of multiple tau-PET measures as biomarkers in aging and Alzheimer's disease.
基于结构和功能连接组学约束的长期延迟回忆型皮质-海马网络图谱:一项病例对照多模态 MRI 研究。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2023 Mar 24;15(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13195-023-01197-7.
4
Uncovering heterogeneous cognitive trajectories in mild cognitive impairment: a data-driven approach.揭示轻度认知障碍中的异质认知轨迹:一种数据驱动的方法。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2023 Mar 20;15(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13195-023-01205-w.
5
Why a clinical trial is as good as its outcome measure: A framework for the selection and use of cognitive outcome measures for clinical trials of Alzheimer's disease.为何临床试验与结局测量同等重要:阿尔茨海默病临床试验中认知结局测量选择和使用的框架。
Alzheimers Dement. 2023 Feb;19(2):708-720. doi: 10.1002/alz.12773. Epub 2022 Sep 10.
6
Finding Treatment Effects in Alzheimer Trials in the Face of Disease Progression Heterogeneity.面对疾病进展异质性,在阿尔茨海默病试验中寻找治疗效果。
Neurology. 2021 Jun 1;96(22):e2673-e2684. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012022.
7
Using a Digital Neuro Signature to measure longitudinal individual-level change in Alzheimer's disease: the Altoida large cohort study.利用数字神经特征测量阿尔茨海默病纵向个体水平变化:阿尔托伊达大型队列研究
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Jun 24;4(1):101. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00470-z.
8
Association between ε2 and Aβ burden in patients with Alzheimer- and vascular-type cognitive impairment.阿尔茨海默病和血管性认知障碍患者 ε2 与 Aβ 负担的相关性。
Neurology. 2020 Oct 27;95(17):e2354-e2365. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010811. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
9
Diagnostic accuracy of cognitive screening tools under different neuropsychological definitions for poststroke cognitive impairment.不同的脑卒中后认知障碍神经心理学定义下认知筛查工具的诊断准确性。
Brain Behav. 2020 Aug;10(8):e01671. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1671. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
比较多种 tau-PET 指标作为衰老和阿尔茨海默病的生物标志物。
Neuroimage. 2017 Aug 15;157:448-463. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.058. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
4
Spontaneous Reversion of Mild Cognitive Impairment to Normal Cognition: A Systematic Review of Literature and Meta-Analysis.轻度认知障碍自发恢复至正常认知:文献系统综述与荟萃分析
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Oct 1;17(10):943-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.06.020. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
5
Progression of mild cognitive impairment to dementia due to AD in clinical settings.在临床环境中,由 AD 导致的轻度认知障碍向痴呆的进展。
Neurology. 2015 Jul 28;85(4):331-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001788. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
6
The interaction of APOE genotype by age in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a voxel-based morphometric study.遗忘型轻度认知障碍中APOE基因分型与年龄的相互作用:一项基于体素的形态学研究。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;43(2):657-68. doi: 10.3233/JAD-141677.
7
The heterogeneity and natural history of mild cognitive impairment of visual memory predominant type.以视觉记忆为主型轻度认知障碍的异质性和自然史。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;43(1):143-52. doi: 10.3233/JAD-140318.
8
Biological heterogeneity in ADNI amnestic mild cognitive impairment.ADNI遗忘型轻度认知障碍中的生物学异质性。
Alzheimers Dement. 2014 Sep;10(5):511-521.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.09.003. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
9
Integration and relative value of biomarkers for prediction of MCI to AD progression: spatial patterns of brain atrophy, cognitive scores, APOE genotype and CSF biomarkers.用于预测轻度认知障碍(MCI)向阿尔茨海默病(AD)进展的生物标志物的整合与相对价值:脑萎缩的空间模式、认知评分、载脂蛋白E(APOE)基因型和脑脊液生物标志物
Neuroimage Clin. 2013 Nov 28;4:164-73. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2013.11.010. eCollection 2014.
10
Comparison of cortical thickness in patients with early-stage versus late-stage amnestic mild cognitive impairment.比较早期和晚期遗忘型轻度认知障碍患者的皮质厚度。
Eur J Neurol. 2014;21(1):86-92. doi: 10.1111/ene.12251. Epub 2013 Aug 22.