Department of Orthopaedics, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 21;9(1):e026360. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026360.
Ankle fractures are common in the elderly population. Surgical fixation is technically challenging and often results in complications due to high rates of osteoporosis and vascular disease. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) often requires prolonged periods of non-weight bearing increasing the risks of complications. Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) nailing has been suggested as an alternative to ORIF which allows immediate weight bearing, and is suggested to result in fewer complications. This study aims to compare the two surgical techniques in the elderly population with ankle fractures.
The study will be a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial comparing ORIF to TTC nailing in 110 patients with ankle fractures aged 50 or above with a Charlson Comorbidity Index of greater than or equal to four. Participants and assessors will not be blinded to intervention. The primary outcome measure will be overall complication rate. Secondary outcomes include length of hospital stay, mobility at discharge, discharge destination, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot score, the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score, mortality rate, rate of secondary surgical interventions and number of blood transfusions required postoperatively. Our null hypothesis is that there is no clinically significant difference in the primary outcome measure between the two treatment groups.
The study has been approved by Metro South Hospital and Health Services Human Research Ethics Committee (EC00167) (reference number HREC/17/QPAH/351).
Completion of this trial will provide evidence on the effectiveness of TTC nailing versus ORIF in treatment of the elderly ankle fracture. If TTC nailing is found to result in superior outcomes, this trial has the capacity to change current clinical practice.
ACTRN12617001588381;Pre-results andU1111-1203-1704.
踝关节骨折在老年人群中较为常见。由于骨质疏松症和血管疾病发病率高,手术固定具有一定的技术挑战性,且常导致并发症。切开复位内固定(ORIF)通常需要长时间的非负重,增加了并发症的风险。经皮胫距跟骨(TTC)钉固定术已被提议作为 ORIF 的替代方法,可立即负重,并可减少并发症。本研究旨在比较两种手术技术在老年踝关节骨折患者中的应用。
本研究将是一项多中心、前瞻性、随机对照试验,比较 110 例年龄在 50 岁及以上、合并Charlson 合并症指数≥4 的踝关节骨折患者接受 ORIF 与 TTC 钉固定的效果。参与者和评估者不会对干预措施进行盲法。主要结局指标是总并发症发生率。次要结局指标包括住院时间、出院时的活动能力、出院去向、美国矫形足踝协会踝-后足评分、Olerud-Molander 踝关节评分、死亡率、二次手术干预率和术后所需的输血次数。我们的零假设是两组治疗之间在主要结局指标上没有临床意义上的差异。
该研究已获得 Metro South 医院和卫生服务机构人类研究伦理委员会(EC00167)(参考号 HREC/17/QPAH/351)的批准。
本试验的完成将为 TTC 钉固定与 ORIF 在老年踝关节骨折治疗中的有效性提供证据。如果 TTC 钉固定被发现能产生更好的结果,那么这项试验有可能改变当前的临床实践。
ACTRN12617001588381;预结果和 U1111-1203-1704。