Bushell Francesca M L, Tonner Peter D, Jabbari Sara, Schmid Amy K, Lund Peter A
School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Institute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Front Microbiol. 2019 Jan 8;9:3196. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03196. eCollection 2018.
Different weak organic acids have significant potential as topical treatments for wounds infected by opportunistic pathogens that are recalcitrant to standard treatments. These acids have long been used as bacteriostatic compounds in the food industry, and in some cases are already being used in the clinic. The effects of different organic acids vary with pH, concentration, and the specific organic acid used, but no studies to date on any opportunistic pathogens have examined the detailed interactions between these key variables in a controlled and systematic way. We have therefore comprehensively evaluated the effects of several different weak organic acids on growth of the opportunistic pathogen . We used a semi-automated plate reader to generate growth profiles for two different strains (model laboratory strain PAO1 and clinical isolate PA1054 from a hospital burns unit) in a range of organic acids at different concentrations and pH, with a high level of replication for a total of 162,960 data points. We then compared two different modeling approaches for the interpretation of this time-resolved dataset: parametric logistic regression (with or without a component to include lag phase) vs. non-parametric Gaussian process (GP) regression. Because GP makes no prior assumptions about the nature of the growth, this method proved to be superior in cases where growth did not follow a standard sigmoid functional form, as is common when bacteria grow under stress. Acetic, propionic and butyric acids were all more detrimental to growth than the other acids tested, and although PA1054 grew better than PAO1 under non-stress conditions, this difference largely disappeared as the levels of stress increased. As expected from knowledge of how organic acids behave, their effect was significantly enhanced in combination with low pH, with this interaction being greatest in the case of propionic acid. Our approach lends itself to the characterization of combinatorial interactions between stressors, especially in cases where their impacts on growth render logistic growth models unsuitable.
不同的弱有机酸作为局部治疗对受耐标准治疗的机会性病原体感染的伤口具有显著潜力。这些酸长期以来在食品工业中用作抑菌化合物,并且在某些情况下已在临床中使用。不同有机酸的作用随pH值、浓度以及所使用的特定有机酸而变化,但迄今为止,尚未有关于任何机会性病原体的研究以可控且系统的方式研究这些关键变量之间的详细相互作用。因此,我们全面评估了几种不同弱有机酸对机会性病原体生长的影响。我们使用半自动酶标仪在一系列不同浓度和pH值的有机酸中生成两种不同菌株(模式实验室菌株PAO1和来自医院烧伤病房的临床分离株PA1054)的生长曲线,进行了大量重复实验,共获得162,960个数据点。然后,我们比较了两种不同的建模方法来解释这个时间分辨数据集:参数逻辑回归(有或没有包含滞后期的成分)与非参数高斯过程(GP)回归。由于GP对生长的性质没有先验假设,在细菌在压力下生长时常见的生长不遵循标准S形函数形式的情况下,该方法被证明更优越。乙酸、丙酸和丁酸对生长的损害都比其他测试酸更大,尽管在非应激条件下PA1054比PAO1生长得更好,但随着压力水平的增加,这种差异在很大程度上消失了。正如从有机酸行为的知识所预期的那样,它们与低pH结合时效应显著增强,这种相互作用在丙酸的情况下最为明显。我们的方法有助于表征应激源之间的组合相互作用,特别是在它们对生长的影响使逻辑生长模型不适用的情况下。