Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Radiol. 2019 Feb;20(2):323-331. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.0064.
To analyze the complications of percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy using CT-based imaging modalities for needle guidance in comparison with fluoroscopy in a large retrospective cohort.
This study was approved by multiple Institutional Review Boards and the requirement for informed consent was waived. We retrospectively included 10568 biopsies from eight referral hospitals from 2010 through 2014. In univariate and multivariate logistic analyses, 3 CT-based guidance modalities (CT, CT fluoroscopy, and cone-beam CT) were compared with fluoroscopy in terms of the risk of pneumothorax, pneumothorax requiring chest tube insertion, and hemoptysis, with adjustment for other risk factors.
Pneumothorax occurred in 2298 of the 10568 biopsies (21.7%). Tube insertion was required after 316 biopsies (3.0%), and hemoptysis occurred in 550 cases (5.2%). In the multivariate analysis, pneumothorax was more frequently detected with CT {odds ratio (OR), 2.752 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.325-3.258), < 0.001}, CT fluoroscopy (OR, 1.440 [95% CI, 1.176-1.762], < 0.001), and cone-beam CT (OR, 2.906 [95% CI, 2.235-3.779], < 0.001), but no significant relationship was found for pneumothorax requiring chest tube insertion ( = 0.497, = 0.222, and = 0.216, respectively). The incidence of hemoptysis was significantly lower under CT (OR, 0.348 [95% CI, 0.247-0.491], < 0.001), CT fluoroscopy (OR, 0.594 [95% CI, 0.419-0.843], = 0.004), and cone-beam CT (OR, 0.479 [95% CI, 0.317-0.724], < 0.001) guidance.
Hemoptysis occurred less frequently with CT-based guidance modalities in comparison with fluoroscopy. Although pneumothorax requiring chest tube insertion showed a similar incidence, pneumothorax was more frequently detected using CT-based guidance modalities.
在一项大型回顾性队列研究中,分析使用基于 CT 的影像学引导经皮经胸穿刺活检术与透视引导的并发症。
本研究经多个机构审查委员会批准,豁免了知情同意书的要求。我们回顾性纳入了 2010 年至 2014 年来自 8 家转诊医院的 10568 例活检。在单变量和多变量逻辑分析中,比较了 3 种基于 CT 的引导方式(CT、CT 透视和锥形束 CT)与透视在气胸、需要胸腔引流的气胸和咯血风险方面的差异,并对其他危险因素进行了调整。
10568 例活检中,2298 例(21.7%)发生气胸。316 例(3.0%)需要插入胸腔引流管,550 例(5.2%)发生咯血。多变量分析显示,CT(比值比[OR],2.752[95%置信区间[CI],2.325-3.258],<0.001)、CT 透视(OR,1.440[95%CI,1.176-1.762],<0.001)和锥形束 CT(OR,2.906[95%CI,2.235-3.779],<0.001)的气胸发生率显著更高,但需要胸腔引流的气胸发生率无显著差异(=0.497,=0.222,=0.216)。CT 引导下咯血发生率显著降低(OR,0.348[95%CI,0.247-0.491],<0.001)、CT 透视(OR,0.594[95%CI,0.419-0.843],=0.004)和锥形束 CT(OR,0.479[95%CI,0.317-0.724],<0.001)。
与透视相比,基于 CT 的引导方式发生咯血的风险较低。虽然需要胸腔引流的气胸发生率相似,但基于 CT 的引导方式气胸的检出率更高。