1 University General Hospital Nuestra Señora del Prado, Gerencia de Atención Integrada de Talavera de la Reina (SESCAM), Toledo, Spain.
2 Toledo Physiotherapy Research Group (GIFTO), E.U. Enfermería y Fisioterapia de Toledo, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain.
Clin Rehabil. 2019 May;33(5):894-903. doi: 10.1177/0269215518824691. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
To evaluate the effectiveness of high-intensity laser therapy on shoulder pain and function in subacromial impingement syndrome.
Clinical controlled trial with alternate allocation.
Hospital Department of Rehabilitation.
A total of 46 participants with subacromial impingement syndrome.
Participants were sequence allocated to an intervention group (high-intensity laser therapy + exercise therapy) and control group (sham-laser + exercise therapy) and received 15 sessions (five days a week during three weeks).
Patiens were evaluated at baseline, after 15 sessions, and at one month and at three months after completing the intervention. The main outcome variables were pain and functionality as measured by visual analogue scale; pressure pain threshold; Shoulder Pain and Disability Index; Constant-Murley Score; and QuickDASH. Secondary outcomes were number of sessions at discharge and drug use.
A total of 21 patients in high-intensity laser therapy group (56.7 ± 8.9 years) and 22 patients in sham-laser group (61.3 ± 8.9 years) concluded the study. Visual analogue scale (cm) at baseline, one-month, and three-months were 6.2 ± 0.5, 3 ± 2.6, and 2.6 ± 2.4 for the control group and 5.4 ± 1.5, 3.6 ± 1.3, and 1.8 ± 1.7 for experimental group, respectively. Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (points) at baseline, one-month, and three-monts were 51.8 ± 16.1, 16.3 ± 16.1, and 13.6 ± 17.1 in the control group and 41.8 ± 20.6, 20.5 ± 19.7, 11 ± 14.5 in experimental group, respectively. No differences were found between groups ( P > 0.05).
The effect of high-intensity laser therapy plus exercise is not higher than exercise alone to reduce pain and improve functionality in patients with subacromial syndrome.
评估高强度激光疗法对肩峰下撞击综合征患者肩部疼痛和功能的疗效。
交替分配的临床对照试验。
医院康复科。
共 46 例肩峰下撞击综合征患者。
将患者序列分配至干预组(高强度激光治疗+运动疗法)和对照组(假激光+运动疗法),并接受 15 次治疗(3 周内每周 5 天)。
患者在基线、15 次治疗后、1 个月和 3 个月时进行评估。主要结局变量为视觉模拟评分法评估的疼痛和功能;压力疼痛阈值;肩痛和残疾指数;Constant-Murley 评分;和 QuickDASH。次要结局为出院时的治疗次数和药物使用情况。
高强度激光治疗组 21 例(56.7±8.9 岁)和假激光组 22 例(61.3±8.9 岁)患者完成了研究。对照组基线、1 个月和 3 个月时的视觉模拟评分(cm)分别为 6.2±0.5、3.0±2.6 和 2.6±2.4,实验组分别为 5.4±1.5、3.6±1.3 和 1.8±1.7。对照组基线、1 个月和 3 个月时的肩痛和残疾指数(分)分别为 51.8±16.1、16.3±16.1 和 13.6±17.1,实验组分别为 41.8±20.6、20.5±19.7 和 11.0±14.5。组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
高强度激光治疗联合运动疗法的效果并不高于单纯运动疗法,无法降低肩峰下综合征患者的疼痛和改善功能。