Suppr超能文献

高强度与低强度激光疗法治疗肩峰下撞击综合征患者:一项随机、双盲、对照试验

High-intensity versus low-level laser therapy in treatment of patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.

作者信息

Saleh Marwa Shafiek, Galal Dina Othman Shokri, Ali Mostafa S, Ibrahim Doaa I

机构信息

Department of Basic Science for Physical Therapy, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.

出版信息

Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Jan 6;40(1):8. doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-04262-1.

Abstract

To compare the effects of High-Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT) versus Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) on shoulder pain and disability, shoulder Range of Motion (ROM), Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT), and sleep quality of patients having Subacromial Impingement Syndrome (SAIS). Forty-two patients with SAIS were randomly assigned into three groups, the HILT group (n = 14), the LLLT group (n = 14), and control group (n = 14). All groups received an exercise program consisted of shoulder muscles stretching and strengthening exercises. Along with the exercise program, the HILT group received HILT at 810 nm /980 nm, and LLLT group received LLLT at 904 nm, three times weekly for three weeks. The primary outcome was the change in shoulder pain and disability measured by Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). Secondary outcomes included shoulder ROM using a standard goniometer, PPT measured by pressure algometer, and sleep quality by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Measurements were taken both before and after a 3-week intervention to assess the outcomes. After 3-wk intervention, both the HILT and LLLT groups exhibited significant improvements in all parameters when compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Additionally, there were clinically significant differences between groups supported by a large ES favoring the HILT group for SPADI pain (ηp = 0.71), SPADI disability (ηp = 0.54), SPADI total (ηp = 0.82), PPT (ηp = 0.63), and PSQI (ηp = 0.42). The combination of HILT with exercises proved to be more beneficial in enhancing pain and function, PPT, and sleep quality compared to LLLT combined with exercises in treating patients with SAIS.

摘要

为比较高强度激光疗法(HILT)与低强度激光疗法(LLLT)对肩峰下撞击综合征(SAIS)患者肩部疼痛和功能障碍、肩部活动范围(ROM)、疼痛压力阈值(PPT)及睡眠质量的影响。42例SAIS患者被随机分为三组,即HILT组(n = 14)、LLLT组(n = 14)和对照组(n = 14)。所有组均接受由肩部肌肉拉伸和强化练习组成的运动计划。除运动计划外,HILT组接受810nm/980nm的HILT治疗,LLLT组接受904nm的LLLT治疗,每周三次,共三周。主要结局指标为采用肩部疼痛和功能障碍指数(SPADI)测量的肩部疼痛和功能障碍的变化。次要结局指标包括使用标准量角器测量的肩部ROM、使用压力痛觉计测量的PPT以及使用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)测量的睡眠质量。在为期3周的干预前后进行测量以评估结局。3周干预后,与对照组相比,HILT组和LLLT组在所有参数上均表现出显著改善(p < 0.05)。此外,组间存在临床显著差异,大效应量(ES)支持HILT组在SPADI疼痛(ηp = 0.71)、SPADI功能障碍(ηp = 0.54)、SPADI总分(ηp = 0.82)、PPT(ηp = 0.63)和PSQI(ηp = 0.42)方面更优。与LLLT联合运动相比,HILT联合运动在改善SAIS患者的疼痛和功能、PPT及睡眠质量方面被证明更有益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验