1 Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Dongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
2 Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Clin Rehabil. 2019 Apr;33(4):642-652. doi: 10.1177/0269215518819050. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
OBJECTIVE:: To evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture in patients with vascular cognitive impairment no dementia (VCIND) in comparison with citicoline, an agent for cognitive disturbances associated with chronic cerebral disorders. DESIGN:: A randomized controlled multicenter trial. SETTING:: In three hospitals in Beijing, China. SUBJECTS:: A total of 216 patients with VCIND were recruited. INTERVENTIONS:: Patients with VCIND (mean age of 65.4 years) were randomized to receive acupuncture (two sessions per week) or oral citicoline (100 mg three times daily) over three months. MAIN MEASURES:: The primary outcome was the change from baseline to three months in cognitive symptom, measured by Alzheimer's disease Assessment Scale, cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog). Secondary outcomes included changes from baseline to six months in ADAS-cog, executive function measured by the Clock Drawing Test (CDT), and functional disability measured by the Ability of Daily Living (ADL) scale at three and six months. RESULTS:: At three months, the acupuncture group had a greater decrease in mean ADAS-cog score (-2.33 ± 0.31) than the citicoline group (-1.38 ± 0.34) with a mean difference of -0.95 (95% CI, -1.84 to -0.07, P = 0.035). The mean change from baseline to six months in ADAS-cog also significantly favored acupuncture treatments (acupuncture change -2.61 vs citicoline -1.25, difference: -1.36 points; 95% CI, -2.20 to -0.51; P = 0.002). There was no difference between the two groups on CDT and ADL scores at either time point. CONCLUSION:: Compared with citicoline, acupuncture has comparable and even superior efficacy with improved cognitive and daily living performance as a complementary and alternative medicine treatment for VCIND.
目的:评估与治疗慢性脑疾病相关认知障碍的胞磷胆碱相比,针刺治疗非痴呆型血管性认知障碍(VCIND)患者的疗效。
设计:一项随机对照多中心试验。
地点:中国北京的 3 家医院。
患者:共招募 216 例 VCIND 患者。
干预:VCIND 患者(平均年龄 65.4 岁)被随机分为针刺组(每周 2 次)或口服胞磷胆碱组(每日 3 次,每次 100mg),疗程 3 个月。
主要观察指标:主要结局指标为阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知分量表(ADAS-cog)从基线至 3 个月的变化,以评估认知症状。次要结局指标包括 ADAS-cog 从基线至 6 个月的变化、以画钟试验(CDT)评估的执行功能变化、以及 3 个月和 6 个月时日常生活能力量表(ADL)评估的功能障碍变化。
结果:3 个月时,针刺组 ADAS-cog 评分的平均下降幅度(-2.33±0.31)大于胞磷胆碱组(-1.38±0.34),差值为-0.95(95%可信区间,-1.84 至 -0.07,P=0.035)。从基线至 6 个月 ADAS-cog 的平均变化也明显有利于针刺治疗(针刺组变化-2.61 分,胞磷胆碱组变化-1.25 分,差值:-1.36 分;95%可信区间,-2.20 至 -0.51;P=0.002)。两组在 CDT 和 ADL 评分上在任何时间点均无差异。
结论:与胞磷胆碱相比,针刺作为 VCIND 的一种补充和替代治疗方法,在改善认知和日常生活能力方面具有相当甚至更优的疗效。
Clin Interv Aging. 2013-2-5
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013-2-7
Front Microbiol. 2025-4-24
Front Rehabil Sci. 2023-5-24
Int J Gen Med. 2022-9-13
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022-5-6