Doll Michelle, Fleming Michele, Stevens Michael P, Bearman Gonzalo
Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, 1300 E. Marshall Street, Richmond, VA, 23298-0019, USA.
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2019 Jan 23;21(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s11908-019-0659-8.
New controversies in the diagnosis and prevention of Clostridiodes difficile are challenging and at times changing infection control practice at many medical centers.
Molecular epidemiologic studies are changing our understanding of C. difficile and its spectrum of disease. C. difficile as a hospital-acquired infection is likely largely overdiagnosed given overly sensitive molecular testing and widespread colonization of ill or debilitated patients. Clostridiodes difficile infection continues to challenge infection prevention programs. Shifts in our understanding of the epidemiology of this organism and its spectrum of clinical presentations are changing the approach to prevention efforts. Nevertheless, cleanliness of the healthcare environment and antimicrobial stewardship remain core risk reduction strategies. Other strategies such as screening and isolation are inciting controversy. The optimal infection prevention strategies for C. difficile remain the subject of intense study and debate.
艰难梭菌感染的诊断与预防方面出现的新争议具有挑战性,有时还会改变许多医疗中心的感染控制措施。
分子流行病学研究正在改变我们对艰难梭菌及其疾病谱的认识。鉴于分子检测过于敏感以及患病或虚弱患者中艰难梭菌的广泛定植,艰难梭菌作为一种医院获得性感染很可能被过度诊断。艰难梭菌感染继续对感染预防计划构成挑战。我们对这种病原体的流行病学及其临床表现谱的认识转变正在改变预防措施。尽管如此,医疗环境的清洁和抗菌药物管理仍然是核心的风险降低策略。其他策略如筛查和隔离引发了争议。艰难梭菌的最佳感染预防策略仍是深入研究和辩论的主题。