• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两步法艰难梭菌诊断算法中粪便样本 PCR+/Tox-患者的临床异质性。

Clinical heterogeneity of patients with stool samples testing PCR+/Tox- from a two-step Clostridium difficile diagnostic algorithm.

机构信息

Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018 Dec;37(12):2355-2359. doi: 10.1007/s10096-018-3383-7. Epub 2018 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1007/s10096-018-3383-7
PMID:30238342
Abstract

The clinical significance of indeterminate (PCR+/Tox-) results for patients tested with a two-step algorithm for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the clinical presentation and 8-week outcomes of patients with indeterminate test results. Patients with stool samples testing positive by PCR and negative by toxin A/B immunoassay between February 1, 2017, and April 30, 2018, were assessed by antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) clinicians and classified as colonized or infected. Retrospective chart review was performed to obtain outcomes occurring within 8 weeks of testing, including recurrent C. difficile diarrhea, subsequent treatment for CDI, follow-up C. difficile testing, all-cause mortality, and CDI-related complications. In total, 110 PCR+/Tox- patients were evaluated. ASP classified 54% of patients as infected and 46% as colonized. Patients assessed and classified as colonized did not have increased adverse outcomes by 8 weeks compared to those assessed as infected, despite not receiving treatment for CDI. We conclude that PCR+/Tox- patients are heterogeneous with respect to clinical presentation. Negative toxin A/B immunoassay in a two-step algorithm should not be interpreted in isolation to distinguish colonization from infection as many PCR+/Tox- results may be clinically significant for CDI.

摘要

两步法检测艰难梭菌感染(CDI)中不确定(PCR+/Tox-)结果的临床意义尚不确定。我们旨在评估具有不确定检测结果患者的临床表现和 8 周结局。2017 年 2 月 1 日至 2018 年 4 月 30 日,对 PCR 阳性且毒素 A/B 免疫测定阴性的粪便样本患者进行抗菌药物管理计划(ASP)临床医生评估,并分为定植或感染。通过回顾性图表审查获得检测后 8 周内发生的结局,包括复发性艰难梭菌腹泻、随后治疗 CDI、后续艰难梭菌检测、全因死亡率和 CDI 相关并发症。共有 110 例 PCR+/Tox-患者接受了评估。ASP 将 54%的患者分类为感染,46%的患者分类为定植。与被评估为感染的患者相比,评估为定植的患者在 8 周内没有增加不良结局,尽管没有接受 CDI 治疗。我们得出结论,PCR+/Tox-患者在临床表现上具有异质性。两步法中的阴性毒素 A/B 免疫测定不能孤立地用于区分定植和感染,因为许多 PCR+/Tox-结果可能对 CDI 具有临床意义。

相似文献

1
Clinical heterogeneity of patients with stool samples testing PCR+/Tox- from a two-step Clostridium difficile diagnostic algorithm.两步法艰难梭菌诊断算法中粪便样本 PCR+/Tox-患者的临床异质性。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018 Dec;37(12):2355-2359. doi: 10.1007/s10096-018-3383-7. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
2
Overdiagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infection in the Molecular Test Era.分子检测时代艰难梭菌感染的过度诊断
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Nov;175(11):1792-801. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4114.
3
[The use of two-stage algorithm in the diagnosis of patients with low levels of Clostridium difficile toxins A/B in feces confirmed by using enzyme immunoassay].[应用两阶段算法诊断粪便中艰难梭菌毒素A/B水平较低且经酶免疫测定确诊的患者]
Med Dosw Mikrobiol. 2013;65(4):263-8.
4
Performance of the TechLab C. DIFF CHEK-60 enzyme immunoassay (EIA) in combination with the C. difficile Tox A/B II EIA kit, the Triage C. difficile panel immunoassay, and a cytotoxin assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.TechLab艰难梭菌检测-60酶免疫测定法(EIA)联合艰难梭菌毒素A/B II EIA试剂盒、Triage艰难梭菌检测板免疫测定法及细胞毒素测定法用于诊断艰难梭菌相关性腹泻的性能
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Oct;42(10):4863-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.10.4863-4865.2004.
5
Impact of simultaneous glutamate dehydrogenase and toxin A/B rapid immunoassay on Clostridium difficile diagnosis and treatment in hospitalized patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhea in a university hospital of Brazil.巴西某大学附属医院住院患者抗生素相关性腹泻中同时进行谷氨酸脱氢酶和毒素 A/B 快速免疫测定对艰难梭菌诊断和治疗的影响。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Feb;33(2):393-396. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13901.
6
[Investigation of toxin genes of Clostridium difficile strains isolated from hospitalized patients with diarrhoea at Marmara University Hospital].[对从马尔马拉大学医院腹泻住院患者中分离出的艰难梭菌菌株毒素基因的研究]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2011 Jan;45(1):1-10.
7
Evaluation of different methods for detection of Clostridium difficile toxins in Poland.波兰不同艰难梭菌毒素检测方法的评估。
Acta Microbiol Pol. 1999;48(4):349-53.
8
Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated disease: examination of multiple algorithms using toxin EIA, glutamate dehydrogenase EIA and loop-mediated isothermal amplification.艰难梭菌相关性疾病的诊断:使用毒素酶免疫测定、谷氨酸脱氢酶酶免疫测定和环介导等温扩增对多种算法进行检测
Br J Biomed Sci. 2012;69(3):112-8.
9
Diagnosis and outcome of Clostridium difficile infection by toxin enzyme immunoassay and polymerase chain reaction in an island population.通过毒素酶免疫测定和聚合酶链反应对岛屿人群艰难梭菌感染的诊断及结果
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Feb;32(2):415-419. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13504.
10
Evaluation of three rapid assays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A and toxin B in stool specimens.三种快速检测粪便标本中艰难梭菌毒素A和毒素B方法的评估。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007 Feb;26(2):115-9. doi: 10.1007/s10096-006-0251-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Impact of Stool Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Testing in Hospitalized Patients with Acute Diarrhea: A Retrospective Observational Study.粪便聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测对急性腹泻住院患者的临床影响:一项回顾性观察研究
Biomedicines. 2025 May 9;13(5):1155. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13051155.
2
Clinical significance of toxin EIA positivity in patients with suspected infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.疑似感染患者毒素酶免疫测定阳性的临床意义:系统评价与Meta分析
J Clin Microbiol. 2025 Jan 31;63(1):e0097724. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00977-24. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
3
Potential underreporting of treated patients using a testing algorithm that screens with a nucleic acid amplification test.

本文引用的文献

1
Molecular-based diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection is associated with reduced mortality.基于分子的艰难梭菌感染诊断与降低死亡率相关。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018 Jun;37(6):1137-1142. doi: 10.1007/s10096-018-3228-4. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
2
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults and Children: 2017 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA).临床实践指南:成人和儿童艰难梭菌感染:美国传染病学会(IDSA)和美国医疗保健流行病学学会(SHEA)2017 年更新。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 19;66(7):987-994. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy149.
3
使用一种通过核酸扩增试验进行筛查的检测算法,可能会导致治疗患者的漏报。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 May;45(5):590-598. doi: 10.1017/ice.2023.262. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
4
Syndromic Panel Testing Among Patients With Infectious Diarrhea: The Challenge of Interpreting Positivity on a Multiplex Molecular Panel.感染性腹泻患者的综合征检测:解读多重分子检测板阳性结果的挑战
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Apr 10;10(5):ofad184. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad184. eCollection 2023 May.
5
Evaluation of a two step testing algorithm to improve diagnostic accuracy and stewardship of Clostridioides difficile infections.评估两步检测算法以提高艰难梭菌感染的诊断准确性和管理水平。
BMC Res Notes. 2023 Aug 14;16(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s13104-023-06398-9.
6
Optimizing the interpretation of two-step diagnostic algorithm results through antimicrobial stewardship.通过抗菌药物管理优化两步诊断算法结果的解读
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2022 Dec 15;2(1):e201. doi: 10.1017/ash.2022.350. eCollection 2022.
7
The Current Knowledge on Infection in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.关于炎症性肠病患者感染的当前知识
Pathogens. 2022 Jul 21;11(7):819. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11070819.
8
Diagnostic Methods of Infection and Ribotypes in Studied Sample.所研究样本中感染及核糖型的诊断方法
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Aug 25;10(9):1035. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10091035.
9
Prospective Review of Testing Indications to Inform Local Laboratory Stewardship Initiatives.为指导当地实验室管理举措而对检测指征进行的前瞻性评估。
Infect Prev Pract. 2019 Aug 5;1(2):100017. doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2019.100017. eCollection 2019 Jun.
10
Infection, Still a Long Way to Go.感染,仍有很长的路要走。
J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 20;10(3):389. doi: 10.3390/jcm10030389.
Comparison of the clinical course of Clostridium difficile infection in glutamate dehydrogenase-positive toxin-negative patients diagnosed by PCR to those with a positive toxin test.
对比应用 PCR 技术诊断为谷氨酸脱氢酶阳性而毒素检测阴性的艰难梭菌感染患者与毒素检测阳性患者的临床病程。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Apr;24(4):414-421. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.07.033. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
4
Trends in the use of laboratory tests for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection and association with incidence rates in Quebec, Canada, 2010-2014.2010-2014 年加拿大魁北克省应用实验室检测诊断艰难梭菌感染的趋势及其与发病率的相关性。
Am J Infect Control. 2017 Sep 1;45(9):964-968. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 May 23.
5
Protective Factors in the Intestinal Microbiome Against Clostridium difficile Infection in Recipients of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.异基因造血干细胞移植受者肠道微生物群中抵抗艰难梭菌感染的保护因素
J Infect Dis. 2017 Apr 1;215(7):1117-1123. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix011.
6
Point-Counterpoint: What Is the Optimal Approach for Detection of Clostridium difficile Infection?针锋相对:艰难梭菌感染检测的最佳方法是什么?
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Mar;55(3):670-680. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02463-16. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
7
European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: update of the diagnostic guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection.欧洲临床微生物学和传染病学会:艰难梭菌感染诊断指南文件的更新。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016 Aug;22 Suppl 4:S63-81. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
8
Overdiagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infection in the Molecular Test Era.分子检测时代艰难梭菌感染的过度诊断
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Nov;175(11):1792-801. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4114.
9
Laboratory and Clinical features of EIA Toxin-positive and EIA Toxin-negative Community-acquired Clostridium difficile Infection.酶免疫分析毒素阳性和酶免疫分析毒素阴性社区获得性艰难梭菌感染的实验室及临床特征
Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2015 Spring;45(3):333-9.
10
Administration of spores of nontoxigenic Clostridium difficile strain M3 for prevention of recurrent C. difficile infection: a randomized clinical trial.非产毒艰难梭菌 M3 菌株孢子给药预防复发性艰难梭菌感染:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2015 May 5;313(17):1719-27. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.3725.