Purnell Jennifer A, Bourget-Murray Jonathan, Kwapisz Adam, Bois Aaron J, LeBlanc Justin
Department of Surgery, Section of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Clinic of Orthopaedics and Paediatric Orthopaedics, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Jan 23;14(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-1041-5.
This review compares the outcomes and complication rates of three surgical strategies used for the management of symptomatic os acromiale. The purpose of this study was to help guide best practice recommendations.
A systematic review of nine prospective studies, seven retrospective studies, and three case studies published across ten countries between 1993 and 2018 was performed. Adult patients (i.e., ≥ 18 years of age) with a symptomatic os acromiale that failed nonoperative management were included in this review. Surgical techniques utilized within the included studies include excision, acromioplasty, and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The primary outcomes of interest included patient satisfaction. Range of motion and several standardized outcome measurement tools were also included in the final analysis.
Patient satisfaction was highest in the excision and ORIF groups, with 92% and 82% of patients reporting good to excellent postoperative results, respectively, compared to 63% in the acromioplasty group. All three patient groups experienced improvements in postoperative outcomes (i.e., active range of motion and patient-reported outcome scores). The excision group experienced a complication rate of 1%, while the acromioplasty group experienced a complication rate of 11% and the ORIF group a rate of 67%.
This study reports on the largest sample of patients who underwent surgical treatment for a symptomatic os acromiale. We have demonstrated that excision of the os with meticulous repair of the deltoid resulted in the best clinical outcomes with the least complications. In healthy adult patients with a large os fragment and a normal rotator cuff, surgical fixation may provide increased preservation of deltoid function while offering good to excellent patient satisfaction. However, patients must be informed that a second procedure may be required to remove symptomatic hardware.
本综述比较了用于治疗有症状的肩峰骨的三种手术策略的结果和并发症发生率。本研究的目的是帮助指导最佳实践建议。
对1993年至2018年在十个国家发表的九项前瞻性研究、七项回顾性研究和三项病例研究进行了系统综述。本综述纳入了非手术治疗失败的有症状肩峰骨的成年患者(即≥18岁)。纳入研究中使用的手术技术包括切除、肩峰成形术和切开复位内固定(ORIF)。主要关注的结果包括患者满意度。最终分析还包括活动范围和几种标准化的结果测量工具。
切除组和ORIF组的患者满意度最高,分别有92%和82%的患者报告术后结果良好至优秀,相比之下肩峰成形术组为63%。所有三个患者组的术后结果(即主动活动范围和患者报告的结果评分)均有改善。切除组的并发症发生率为1%,而肩峰成形术组为11%,ORIF组为67%。
本研究报告了接受有症状肩峰骨手术治疗的最大患者样本。我们已经证明,切除肩峰骨并仔细修复三角肌可产生最佳的临床结果,并发症最少。在肩峰骨碎片大且肩袖正常的健康成年患者中,手术固定可能会增加三角肌功能的保留,同时提供良好至优秀的患者满意度。然而,必须告知患者可能需要进行第二次手术以取出有症状的硬件。