Modig J
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1988;89:44-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1988.tb02842.x.
Epidural and spinal anaesthesia for various types of surgery offer advantages over general anaesthesia by decreasing blood loss and transfusion requirements. This paper focuses on the importance of the choice of anaesthesia on surgical blood loss in total hip arthroplasty. Haemodynamic differences, with lower arterial blood pressure, lower central venous blood pressure, and most importantly lower peripheral venous blood pressure in the surgical wound seem to explain the lower blood loss intra- and post-operatively in patients given regional anaesthesia. These differences in haemodynamics give rise to less arterial, and notably less venous oozing of blood from the surgical area. The latter observation is strengthened by the significant correlations between the intraoperative peripheral venous blood pressure and the intraoperative blood loss. The reduction in blood loss and consequently the reduced transfusion requirements in regional anaesthesia are beneficial in decreasing the hazards and costs of homologous blood transfusion. Although impossible to quantify, reduced bleeding also greatly facilitates the surgeon's work.
与全身麻醉相比,硬膜外麻醉和脊髓麻醉用于各类手术时,在减少失血和输血需求方面具有优势。本文重点探讨麻醉方式的选择对全髋关节置换术中手术失血的重要性。血流动力学差异,即动脉血压较低、中心静脉压较低,最重要的是手术伤口处外周静脉压较低,似乎可以解释接受区域麻醉的患者术中和术后失血较少的原因。这些血流动力学差异导致手术区域动脉出血减少,尤其是静脉渗血减少。术中外周静脉压与术中失血之间的显著相关性进一步证实了后一种观察结果。区域麻醉中失血减少以及由此导致的输血需求降低,有利于降低同种异体输血的风险和成本。虽然无法量化,但出血减少也极大地便利了外科医生的操作。