Agricultural Research Council, Irene, South Africa.
UNE Business School, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
Meat Sci. 2019 Apr;150:122-130. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.12.011. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
A total of 720 South African consumers sourced from rural and urban backgrounds scored willingness to pay (WTP) for different eating quality grades of beef. The consumers had previously participated in taste panels which scored eating quality of grilled and slow cook samples before grading them as either 2 (unsatisfactory), 3 (good every day), 4 (better than everyday), or 5 (premium) star quality. Consumers provided details on demographic and meat preference traits. Eating quality grade had the largest effect on WTP (P < .001). Whether consumers were sourced from urban or rural backgrounds, or had tasted beef prepared using grill or slow cook methods had little effect on WTP (P > .05). Similarly, demographic and meat preference traits had little effect of WTP (P > .05), with the exception that at the higher meat quality grades older consumers had a lower WTP than younger age groups (P < .05), as did households with >8 adult consumers (P < .05).
共有 720 名来自农村和城市背景的南非消费者对不同食用品质等级的牛肉的支付意愿(WTP)进行了评分。这些消费者之前曾参加过品尝小组,对烤和慢煮样本的食用质量进行了评分,然后将其评为 2 分(不满意)、3 分(每天都好)、4 分(比每天都好)或 5 分(优质)星级质量。消费者提供了有关人口统计和肉类偏好特征的详细信息。食用品质等级对 WTP 的影响最大(P<0.001)。无论消费者是来自城市还是农村背景,或者是否品尝过用烤或慢煮方法准备的牛肉,对 WTP 的影响都很小(P>0.05)。同样,人口统计和肉类偏好特征对 WTP 的影响也很小(P>0.05),但在较高的肉类质量等级中,年龄较大的消费者的 WTP 低于年龄较小的年龄组(P<0.05),拥有>8 名成年消费者的家庭也是如此(P<0.05)。