• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

爱尔兰消费者对牛肉食用品质的评估。

Evaluation of beef eating quality by Irish consumers.

作者信息

McCarthy S N, Henchion M, White A, Brandon K, Allen P

机构信息

Teagasc Food Research Centre, Ashtown, Dublin 15, Ireland.

Teagasc Food Research Centre, Ashtown, Dublin 15, Ireland.

出版信息

Meat Sci. 2017 Oct;132:118-124. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.05.005
PMID:28522169
Abstract

A consumer's decision to purchase beef is strongly linked to its sensory properties and consistent eating quality is one of the most important attributes. Consumer taste panels were held according to the Meat Standards Australia guidelines and consumers scored beef according to its palatability attributes and completed a socio-demographic questionnaire. Consumers were able to distinguish between beef quality on a scale from unsatisfactory to premium with high accuracy. Premium cuts of beef scored significantly higher on all of the scales compared to poorer quality cuts. Men rated grilled beef higher on juiciness and flavour scales compared to women. Being the main purchaser of beef had no impact on rating scores. Overall the results show that consumers can judge eating quality with high accuracy. Further research is needed to determine how best to communicate inherent benefits that are not visible into extrinsic eating quality indicators, to provide the consumer with consistent indications of quality at the point of purchase.

摘要

消费者购买牛肉的决定与其感官特性密切相关,而稳定的食用品质是最重要的属性之一。按照澳大利亚肉类标准指南组织了消费者品尝小组,消费者根据牛肉的适口性属性对其进行评分,并填写一份社会人口统计学调查问卷。消费者能够以很高的准确度区分从不满意到优质的不同牛肉品质。与质量较差的切块相比,优质牛肉切块在所有评分标准上的得分都显著更高。在多汁性和风味评分标准上,男性对烤牛肉的评分高于女性。作为牛肉的主要购买者对评分没有影响。总体而言,结果表明消费者能够以很高的准确度判断食用品质。需要进一步研究以确定如何最好地将不可见的内在优势转化为外在的食用品质指标,以便在购买时为消费者提供一致的品质指示。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of beef eating quality by Irish consumers.爱尔兰消费者对牛肉食用品质的评估。
Meat Sci. 2017 Oct;132:118-124. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 8.
2
Untrained consumer assessment of the eating quality of European beef: 2. Demographic factors have only minor effects on consumer scores and willingness to pay.未经训练的消费者对欧洲牛肉食用品质的评价:2. 人口统计学因素对消费者评分和支付意愿的影响较小。
Animal. 2017 Aug;11(8):1399-1411. doi: 10.1017/S1751731117000076. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
3
Untrained consumer assessment of the eating quality of beef: 1. A single composite score can predict beef quality grades.未经训练的消费者对牛肉食用品质的评价:1. 单一综合评分可预测牛肉质量等级。
Animal. 2017 Aug;11(8):1389-1398. doi: 10.1017/S1751731116002305. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
4
Do demographic and beef eating preferences impact on South African consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) for graded beef?人口统计和牛肉食用偏好会影响南非消费者对分级牛肉的支付意愿(WTP)吗?
Meat Sci. 2019 Apr;150:122-130. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.12.011. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
5
Review: The variability of the eating quality of beef can be reduced by predicting consumer satisfaction.综述:通过预测消费者满意度,可以降低牛肉食用品质的可变性。
Animal. 2018 Nov;12(11):2434-2442. doi: 10.1017/S1751731118000605. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
6
The variation in the eating quality of beef from different sexes and breed classes cannot be completely explained by carcass measurements.不同性别和品种类别的牛肉的食用品质差异不能完全通过胴体测量来解释。
Animal. 2016 Jun;10(6):987-95. doi: 10.1017/S175173111500292X. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
7
Regional, socioeconomic and behavioural- impacts on consumer acceptability of beef in Northern Ireland, Republic of Ireland and Great Britain.北爱尔兰、爱尔兰共和国和英国的地区、社会经济和行为因素对牛肉消费者接受度的影响。
Meat Sci. 2019 Aug;154:86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
8
A comparison of Japanese and Australian consumers' sensory perceptions of beef.日本和澳大利亚消费者对牛肉的感官认知比较。
Anim Sci J. 2014 Jan;85(1):69-74. doi: 10.1111/asj.12081. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
9
Japanese consumer categorisation of beef into quality grades, based on Meat Standards Australia methodology.日本消费者根据澳大利亚肉类标准,对牛肉进行质量等级分类。
Anim Sci J. 2011 Apr;82(2):325-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2010.00825.x. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
10
Review: Beef-eating quality: a European journey.综述:牛肉食用品质:欧洲之旅。
Animal. 2018 Nov;12(11):2424-2433. doi: 10.1017/S1751731118001672. Epub 2018 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Genome-wide identification and analysis of long noncoding RNAs in longissimus muscle tissue from Kazakh cattle and Xinjiang brown cattle.哈萨克牛和新疆褐牛背最长肌组织中长链非编码RNA的全基因组鉴定与分析
Anim Biosci. 2021 Nov;34(11):1739-1748. doi: 10.5713/ajas.20.0317. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
2
Various Statistical Approaches to Assess and Predict Carcass and Meat Quality Traits.评估和预测胴体及肉质性状的各种统计方法。
Foods. 2020 Apr 22;9(4):525. doi: 10.3390/foods9040525.
3
Drivers of Consumer Liking for Beef, Pork, and Lamb: A Review.
消费者对牛肉、猪肉和羊肉喜好的驱动因素:综述
Foods. 2020 Apr 3;9(4):428. doi: 10.3390/foods9040428.
4
Predicting the Quality of Meat: Myth or Reality?预测肉类品质:神话还是现实?
Foods. 2019 Sep 24;8(10):436. doi: 10.3390/foods8100436.
5
Effects of Dry- and Wet-ageing on Flavor Compounds and Eating Quality of Low Fat Hanwoo Beef Muscles.干老化和湿老化对低脂韩牛肌肉风味化合物及食用品质的影响
Food Sci Anim Resour. 2019 Aug;39(4):655-667. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2019.e58. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
6
Beef Tenderness Prediction by a Combination of Statistical Methods: Chemometrics and Supervised Learning to Manage Integrative Farm-To-Meat Continuum Data.结合统计方法预测牛肉嫩度:化学计量学与监督学习用于管理从农场到肉类的连续综合数据
Foods. 2019 Jul 22;8(7):274. doi: 10.3390/foods8070274.
7
Effect of Breed and Gender on Meat Quality of Muscle from Crossbred Beef Bulls and Steers.品种和性别对杂交肉牛公牛和阉牛肉品质的影响。
Foods. 2019 May 21;8(5):173. doi: 10.3390/foods8050173.