York Health Economics Consortium, Enterprise House, Innovation Way, University of York, York YO10 5NQ, UK.
Quantics Biostatistics, West End House, 28 Drumsheugh Gardens, Edinburgh EH3 7RN, UK.
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Apr;29:55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.12.040. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
Ocrelizumab was approved for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) and primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) by the US Food and Drug Administration in March 2017 and by the European Medicines Agency in January 2018. These approvals were based on two pivotal randomized controlled trials (RCTs), OPERA I and OPERA II, comparing ocrelizumab 600 mg with an active comparator, interferon β-1a 44 μg (Rebif), and the first trial with positive results in patients with PPMS, which compared ocrelizumab with placebo. However, direct evidence of the efficacy and safety of ocrelizumab in RMS compared with other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) approved for RMS is not available from RCTs. In the absence of such RCTs, network meta-analyses (NMAs) were conducted to compare indirectly the relative efficacy and safety of ocrelizumab with all other approved DMTs for the treatment of RMS.
Systematic literature searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, trial registers, relevant conference websites and health technology assessment agency websites. Eligible RCTs evaluated approved treatments for multiple sclerosis (MS) in which more than 75% of patients had a relapsing form of MS. NMAs were conducted for four efficacy and three safety outcomes, and treatment hierarchies were generated for each outcome using surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values.
Results suggest that ocrelizumab has superior efficacy to 10 of the 17 treatments in the 12-week confirmed disability progression network and 12 of the 17 treatments in the annualized relapse rate network (both including placebo). The efficacy of ocrelizumab was comparable with the other treatments in both networks. In the serious adverse events and discontinuation due to adverse events networks, ocrelizumab demonstrated a safety profile comparable with all other treatments (including placebo). SUCRA values consistently ranked ocrelizumab among the most effective or tolerable treatments across all outcomes.
Results suggest that ocrelizumab has an efficacy superior to or comparable with all other currently approved DMTs across all endpoints analyzed, and a similar safety profile, indicating it offers a valuable package for the treatment of patients with RMS.
奥瑞珠单抗于 2017 年 3 月获得美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准,用于治疗复发型多发性硬化症(RMS)和原发性进展型多发性硬化症(PPMS),于 2018 年 1 月获得欧洲药品管理局(EMA)批准。这两项批准均基于两项关键性随机对照试验(RCT),即 OPERA I 试验和 OPERA II 试验,将奥瑞珠单抗 600mg 与活性对照药干扰素β-1a 44μg(Rebif)进行比较,以及首次在 PPMS 患者中取得阳性结果的试验,将奥瑞珠单抗与安慰剂进行比较。然而,直接比较奥瑞珠单抗与其他已批准用于 RMS 的疾病修正治疗(DMT)的疗效和安全性的 RCT 证据并不充分。在没有此类 RCT 的情况下,进行了网络荟萃分析(NMAs),以间接比较奥瑞珠单抗与所有其他批准用于 RMS 治疗的 DMT 的相对疗效和安全性。
在 MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、试验注册处、相关会议网站和卫生技术评估机构网站进行了系统文献检索。合格的 RCT 评估了超过 75%的患者具有复发型 MS 的多发性硬化症(MS)批准治疗方法。对四项疗效和三项安全性结局进行了 NMAs,并使用累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)值为每个结局生成治疗层次结构。
结果表明,在 12 周确认残疾进展网络中,奥瑞珠单抗优于 17 种治疗方法中的 10 种,在年化复发率网络中,奥瑞珠单抗优于 17 种治疗方法中的 12 种(均包括安慰剂)。在两个网络中,奥瑞珠单抗的疗效与其他治疗方法相当。在严重不良事件和因不良事件停药网络中,奥瑞珠单抗的安全性与所有其他治疗方法(包括安慰剂)相当。SUCRA 值始终将奥瑞珠单抗列为所有结局中最有效或最耐受的治疗方法之一。
结果表明,奥瑞珠单抗在所有分析的结局中具有优于或与所有其他当前批准的 DMT 相当的疗效,且安全性相似,表明它为治疗 RMS 患者提供了一种有价值的治疗方案。