University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 405 Hilgard Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, 650 Charles Young Dr., Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Mar 25;658:1549-1558. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.159. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
Pollutants in tailpipe emissions can be highly elevated around roadways, and in early mornings the pollution plume can extend hundreds of meters into surrounding neighborhoods. Solid sound walls and vegetation barriers are commonly used to mitigate noise, but they also help mitigate near-road air pollution. Here we assess the effectiveness of barriers consisting of vegetation only and of a combination of vegetation and a solid sound wall (combination barrier) in reducing pollution concentrations downwind of roads, under stable atmospheric stability and calm to light wind conditions. Because there was no practical (no barrier) control site in the area, we primarily compare the two barrier types to each other and explore the importance of atmospheric conditions. Using measurements collected with a mobile platform, we develop concentration decay profiles of ultrafine and fine particles, oxides of nitrogen (NO and NO) and carbon monoxide downwind of a freeway in California with different barrier configurations and meteorological conditions. Diurnally averaged data collected with passive samplers indicate that pollution from morning rush hour has about equal impact as the entire remainder of the day, because of differences in atmospheric dispersion as the day progresses. Under calm and stable atmospheric conditions (wind speed <0.6 m/s); a vegetation-only barrier was more effective than a combination barrier with a total height that was somewhat lower than the vegetation-only barrier, by 10-24% in the first 160 m downwind. Under light winds (above ~ 0.6 but below 3 m/s) and stable conditions, the combination barrier was more effective than the vegetation barrier alone, by 6-33%, in the first 160 m from the barrier. The average particle size downwind of the vegetation-only barrier was larger than downwind of the combination barrier, indicating that particle deposition plays an important role in the reductions observed downwind of vegetation. Our results are consistent with the notion that at low wind speeds, vegetation acts as an effective barrier. Overall, adding vegetation alone or to an existing solid barrier results in lower downwind pollution concentrations, especially under low wind speeds when concentrations can be high.
排气管排放的污染物在道路周围可能高度集中,在清晨,污染羽流可以延伸到周围社区数百米。固体隔音墙和植被屏障通常用于减轻噪音,但它们也有助于减轻道路附近的空气污染。在这里,我们评估了仅由植被组成的屏障和由植被与固体隔音墙组合而成的屏障(组合屏障)在稳定大气稳定和微风条件下减少道路下风处污染浓度的效果。由于该地区没有实际的(无屏障)对照点,我们主要将这两种屏障类型相互比较,并探讨大气条件的重要性。我们使用移动平台收集的测量数据,在加利福尼亚州的一条高速公路下风处,开发了不同屏障配置和气象条件下超细颗粒和细颗粒、氮氧化物(NO 和 NO)和一氧化碳的浓度衰减曲线。使用被动采样器收集的日平均数据表明,由于随着白天的进展大气扩散的差异,早晨交通高峰期的污染与一天中的其余时间一样具有同等的影响。在平静和稳定的大气条件下(风速<0.6 m/s);与总高度略低于仅植被屏障的组合屏障相比,仅植被屏障在 160 米下风处的效率高 10-24%。在微风(大于约 0.6 但低于 3 m/s)和稳定条件下,与单独的植被屏障相比,组合屏障在 160 米下风处的效率高 6-33%。仅植被屏障下风处的平均粒径大于组合屏障下风处的粒径,表明颗粒沉积在观察到的植被下风处的减少中起着重要作用。我们的结果与以下观点一致,即在低风速下,植被充当有效的屏障。总体而言,单独添加植被或在现有的固体屏障上添加植被会导致下风处的污染浓度降低,尤其是在风速较低时,浓度可能很高。