Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, 366256Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hwaseong-si, Republic of Korea.
J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;35(12):1405-1410. doi: 10.1177/0885066619826045. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
Although prognostic prediction scores for pneumonia such as CURB-65 score or pneumonia severity index (PSI) are widely used, there were a few studies in very elderly patients. The aim of the study was to validate prognostic prediction scores for severe pneumonia and investigate risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality of severe pneumonia in very elderly patients.
During the 6-year study period (from October 2012 to May 2018), 160 patients aged 80 or older admitted to medical intensive unit were analyzed retrospectively. Pneumonia severity was evaluated using CURB-65 score, PSI, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, A-DROP, I-ROAD, UBMo index, SOAR score, and lactate. The outcome was in-hospital mortality.
The median age was 85 years (interquartile range: 82-88). Nursing home residents accounted for 71 (44.4%) and in-hospital mortality was 40 (25.0%). Logistic regression showed that chronic lung, mechanical ventilation, hemodialysis, and albumin were associated with in-hospital mortality of pneumonia. Using the receiver operating characteristics curve for predicting mortality, the area under the curve in pneumonia was 0.65 for the SOFA score, 0.61 for the CURB-65 score, 0.52 for the PSI, 0.58 for the A-DROP, 0.52 for the I-ROAD, 0.54 for UBMo index, 0.59 for SOAR score, and 0.65 for lactate.
The performances of the CURB-65 and PSI are not excellent in very elderly patients with pneumonia. Further studies are needed to improve the performance of prognostic prediction scores in elderly patients.
尽管 CURB-65 评分或肺炎严重指数(PSI)等肺炎预后预测评分被广泛应用,但针对非常高龄患者的研究较少。本研究旨在验证严重肺炎的预后预测评分,并探讨与非常高龄患者严重肺炎院内死亡相关的危险因素。
在 6 年的研究期间(2012 年 10 月至 2018 年 5 月),回顾性分析了 160 名 80 岁或以上入住内科重症监护病房的患者。使用 CURB-65 评分、PSI、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、A-DROP、I-ROAD、UBMo 指数、SOAR 评分和乳酸来评估肺炎严重程度。结局为院内死亡率。
中位年龄为 85 岁(四分位距:82-88 岁)。有 71 名(44.4%)患者为疗养院居民,肺炎院内死亡率为 40 例(25.0%)。Logistic 回归显示,慢性肺病、机械通气、血液透析和白蛋白与肺炎的院内死亡率相关。使用预测死亡率的受试者工作特征曲线,SOFA 评分、CURB-65 评分、PSI、A-DROP、I-ROAD、UBMo 指数、SOAR 评分和乳酸预测肺炎死亡率的曲线下面积分别为 0.65、0.61、0.52、0.58、0.52、0.54、0.59 和 0.65。
CURB-65 和 PSI 在患有肺炎的非常高龄患者中表现不佳。需要进一步研究以提高老年患者预后预测评分的性能。