Suppr超能文献

严重反流患者快速诱导时不同体位对吸引量和插管时间的影响:一项前瞻性随机模拟研究。

The influence of different patient positions during rapid induction with severe regurgitation on the volume of aspirate and time to intubation: a prospective randomised manikin simulation study.

机构信息

Anästhesiologische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Krankenhaustrasse 12, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Jan 24;19(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0686-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aspiration is a main contributor to morbidity and mortality in anaesthesia. The ideal patient positioning for rapid sequence induction remains controversial. A head-down tilt and full cervical spine extension (Sellick) might prevent aspiration but at the same time compromise airway management. We aimed to determine the influence of three different positions during induction of general anaesthesia on the volume of aspirate and on participants' airway management.

METHODS

Eighty-four anaesthetic trainees and consultants participated in a prospective randomised simulation study. Anaesthesia was induced in reverse Trendelenburg position (+ 15°) in a manikin capable of dynamic fluid regurgitation. Participants were randomised to change to Trendelenburg position (- 15°) a) as soon as regurgitation was noticed, b) as soon as 'patient' had been anaesthetised, and c) as soon as 'patient' had been anaesthetised and with full cervical spine extension (Sellick). Primary endpoints were the aspirated volume and the time to intubation. Secondary endpoints were ratings of the laryngoscopic view and the intubation situation (0-100 mm).

RESULTS

Combining head-down tilt with Sellick position significantly reduced aspiration (p < 0.005). Median time to intubate was longer in Sellick position (15 s [8-30]) as compared with the head in sniffing position (10 s [8-12.5]; p < 0.05). Participants found laryngoscopy more difficult in Sellick position (39.3 ± 27.9 mm) as compared with the sniffing position (23.1 ± 22.1 mm; p < 0.05). Both head-down tilt intubation situations were considered equally difficult: 34.8 ± 24.6 mm (Sniffing) vs. 44.2 ± 23.1 mm (Sellick; p = n.s).

CONCLUSIONS

In a simulated setting, using a manikin-based simulator capable of fluid regurgitation, a - 15° head-down tilt with Sellick position reduced the amount of aspirated fluid but increased the difficulty in visualising the vocal cords and prolonged the time taken to intubate. Assessing the airway management in the identical position in healthy patients without risk of aspiration might be a promising next step to take.

摘要

背景

在麻醉中,误吸是导致发病率和死亡率的主要原因。对于快速序贯诱导,理想的患者体位仍存在争议。头低位和全颈椎伸展(Sellick)可能会防止误吸,但同时也会影响气道管理。我们旨在确定在全身麻醉诱导过程中采用三种不同体位对误吸量以及参与者气道管理的影响。

方法

84 名麻醉医师和顾问参加了一项前瞻性随机模拟研究。在可进行动态反流的模拟人体模型中,采用反 Trendelenburg 体位(+15°)诱导麻醉。参与者被随机分配在以下三种体位下改变体位:a)一旦发现反流,b)一旦“患者”被麻醉,c)一旦“患者”被麻醉且行 Sellick 位(全颈椎伸展)。主要终点是误吸量和插管时间。次要终点是喉镜检查视野和插管情况的评分(0-100 毫米)。

结果

头低位联合 Sellick 位可显著减少误吸(p<0.005)。Sellick 位时插管时间中位数较长(15 秒[8-30]),而嗅探位时插管时间中位数较短(10 秒[8-12.5];p<0.05)。参与者发现Sellick 位时喉镜检查更困难(39.3±27.9 毫米),而嗅探位时更简单(23.1±22.1 毫米;p<0.05)。头低位和 Sellick 位两种插管情况被认为同样困难:34.8±24.6 毫米(嗅探位)和 44.2±23.1 毫米(Sellick 位;p=n.s)。

结论

在模拟环境中,使用可进行反流的基于模拟人体模型的设备,-15°头低位联合 Sellick 位可减少误吸量,但增加了观察声带的难度并延长了插管时间。在没有误吸风险的健康患者中,在相同体位下评估气道管理可能是下一步有前途的工作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/208d/6346548/81f269c18674/12871_2019_686_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验