Department of Community Medicine, Delta State University Teaching Hospital, Oghara, Delta State, Nigeria.
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 24;9(1):e022361. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022361.
This study was conducted to assess the concentration of air pollutants at charcoal sites, the dose-response relationship between site-based exposure levels to air pollutants and prevalence of respiratory symptoms among charcoal workers, and the measures these workers employ to safeguard their health.
Cross-sectional but comparative design SETTING: Charcoal production kiln sites in Sapele, Delta State, Nigeria.
Overall 296 charcoal workers and age-matched, sex-matched and height-matched non-exposed traders (comparison group).
The primary outcome measure was the prevalence of respiratory symptoms among charcoal workers while secondary outcomes included lung function indices as well as hazard control practices among charcoal workers.
Majority (83.3%) of the sites had PM and PM values five times higher than the WHO standard. Charcoal workers were more likely to have respiratory symptoms; wheeze was statistically significant after adjusting for confounders, (OR 4.22; CI 1.37 to 12.99). The dose-response relationship between site-based exposure levels to air pollutants and the prevalence of respiratory symptoms among charcoal workers was statistically significant for all symptoms except chest tightness (p=0.167). Mean forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV) and forced vital capacity (FVC) were considerably lower among workers with differences of -0.22 (-0.42 to -0.05) L and -0.52 (-0.76 to -0.29) L, respectively, whereas FEV/FVC ratio and peak expiratory flow rate were higher among workers with mean differences of 5.68 (3.59-8.82)% and 0.31 (-23.70 to 24.43) L/min, respectively; but the mean difference was significant only for the FEV/FVC ratio. Charcoal workers had poor hazard control practices; only 3.4% reportedly used personal protective equipment.
Air pollutants at kiln sites were higher than WHO standards. Despite the significantly higher prevalence of wheeze, chest tightness and chronic cough among charcoal workers, their hazard control practices were inadequate. Charcoal workers should adopt appropriate hazard control practices, and use improved devices which emit minimal pollutants.
本研究旨在评估木炭生产窑址空气中污染物的浓度,以及基于窑址的空气污染物暴露水平与木炭工人呼吸道症状发生率之间的剂量-反应关系,同时还评估了这些工人为保护健康所采取的措施。
横断面但具有可比性的设计
尼日利亚德尔塔州萨佩勒的木炭生产窑址。
共有 296 名木炭工人和年龄、性别、身高匹配的非暴露贸易商(对照组)参加了研究。
主要结果测量指标是木炭工人的呼吸道症状发生率,次要结果测量指标包括肺功能指标以及木炭工人的危害控制措施。
大多数(83.3%)窑址的 PM10 和 PM2.5 浓度均是世界卫生组织标准的五倍以上。木炭工人更有可能出现呼吸道症状;在调整混杂因素后,气喘的统计学意义显著(OR 4.22;95%CI 1.37 至 12.99)。基于窑址的空气污染物暴露水平与木炭工人呼吸道症状发生率之间的剂量-反应关系,除胸闷外,所有症状均具有统计学意义(p=0.167)。工人的第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)和用力肺活量(FVC)均明显较低,分别为-0.22(-0.42 至 -0.05)L 和-0.52(-0.76 至 -0.29)L;而 FEV1/FVC 比值和呼气峰流速较高,分别为 5.68(3.59 至 8.82)%和 0.31(-23.70 至 24.43)L/min;但只有 FEV1/FVC 比值的平均差异具有统计学意义。木炭工人的危害控制措施较差;仅有 3.4%的工人报告使用个人防护设备。
窑址空气中的污染物高于世界卫生组织标准。尽管木炭工人的气喘、胸闷和慢性咳嗽发生率明显较高,但他们的危害控制措施仍不充分。木炭工人应采取适当的危害控制措施,并使用排放污染物最少的改进设备。