Tarbiat Masoud, Davoudi Maryam, Salimbahrami Sayed Ahmadreza
Clinical Research Development Unit of Farshchian Heart Center, Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2018;10(4):192-196. doi: 10.15171/jcvtr.2018.33. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
Percutaneous subclavian vein catheterization via infraclavicular approach is one of the most widely used cannulation techniques for inserting catheters into a central vein. The aim of this study was to evaluate influence of arm position during infraclavicular subclavian vein catheterization with landmark-based technique in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Between September 2017 and June 2018, this prospective randomized clinical trial was performed in 320 patients. The patients were randomly assigned to the Neutral group (the arms kept by the side) or Abduction group (the arm was abducted to 90°). The success and complication rates were compared in the two groups. The data were analyzed using SPSS software. In the first attempt of subclavian vein cannulation, the success rate had no significant difference between the two groups ( = 0.185). In the second attempt of catheterization, the success rate in Abduction group (40.5%) was lower than Neutral group (81.2%). The overall success rate in two attempts were (84.4%) in the Abduction group and (96.2%) in the Neutral group. There was a significant difference between two groups in the second and overall success rates ( = 0.0001). In 34 (10.6%) patients, subclavian artery puncture occurred, 30 (18.8%) in the Abduction group and 4 (2.5%) in the Neutral group. There was a significant difference between two groups ( = 0.0001). Pneumothorax was occurred in 15 (9.4%) in the Abduction group and 3 (1.9%) in the Neutral group. There was also a significant difference between two groups ( = 0.004). The differences in other complications on two groups were statistically insignificant. Compared with Abduction group, the Neutral group resulted in higher success rate and fewer subclavian artery puncture and pneumothorax. The incidences of other complications were similar on both groups.
经锁骨下途径经皮锁骨下静脉置管是将导管插入中心静脉最常用的置管技术之一。本研究旨在评估在冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)中采用基于体表标志技术进行锁骨下静脉置管时手臂位置的影响。2017年9月至2018年6月,对320例患者进行了这项前瞻性随机临床试验。患者被随机分为中立组(手臂自然下垂于身体两侧)或外展组(手臂外展至90°)。比较两组的成功率和并发症发生率。使用SPSS软件对数据进行分析。在首次锁骨下静脉置管尝试中,两组成功率无显著差异( = 0.185)。在第二次置管尝试中,外展组成功率(40.5%)低于中立组(81.2%)。两组两次尝试的总体成功率分别为外展组(84.4%)和中立组(96.2%)。两组在第二次及总体成功率上有显著差异( = 0.0001)。34例(10.6%)患者发生锁骨下动脉穿刺,外展组30例(18.8%),中立组4例(2.5%)。两组有显著差异( = 0.0001)。外展组15例(9.4%)发生气胸,中立组3例(1.9%)。两组也有显著差异( = 0.004)。两组其他并发症差异无统计学意义。与外展组相比,中立组成功率更高,锁骨下动脉穿刺和气胸更少。两组其他并发症发生率相似。