• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在复发性和/或转移性头颈部癌患者中每两个月使用西妥昔单抗的理由和预算影响。

Rationale and budget impact of bimonthly use of Cetuximab in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck cancer.

机构信息

Economic Evaluation and HTA (CEIS-EEHTA) - Faculty of Economics, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.

Department of Accounting, Finance and Informatics, Institute for Leadership and Management in Health - Kingston University London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Head Neck. 2019 Apr;41(4):908-914. doi: 10.1002/hed.25481. Epub 2019 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1002/hed.25481
PMID:30680828
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer, Cetuximab is administered once a week, followed by weekly doses. We present the clinical rationale of a different schedule of maintenance Cetuximab and we estimate the potential economic benefits on the health care budget from a societal perspective in Italy.

METHODS

A budget impact (BI) excel-based model was developed comparing a base case scenario of 100% weekly administration with a dose of 250 mg/m to an every-other-week (EOW) administration at 50% or 100% with a dose of 500 mg/m .

RESULTS

In the EOW, 50% scenario it was calculated a cost reduction of €347 000 of which 70% attributable to indirect costs, increasing to €694 000 after 4 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In our analysis, we showed that this simplified schedule could also reduce the costs of treatments both for the health system (direct costs) and for the society (indirect costs).

摘要

背景

在复发性和/或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌中,西妥昔单抗每周给药一次,随后每周给药。我们提出了维持西妥昔单抗不同方案的临床原理,并从意大利社会角度估计了对医疗保健预算的潜在经济效益。

方法

使用基于 Excel 的预算影响 (BI) 模型,我们将每周 100%给药方案(剂量为 250mg/m)与每两周(EOW)50%或 100%给药方案(剂量为 500mg/m)进行比较。

结果

在 EOW,50%的情况下,我们计算出成本降低了 347000 欧元,其中 70%归因于间接成本,4 个月后增加到 694000 欧元。

结论

在我们的分析中,我们表明这种简化的方案还可以降低医疗系统(直接成本)和社会(间接成本)的治疗成本。

相似文献

1
Rationale and budget impact of bimonthly use of Cetuximab in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck cancer.在复发性和/或转移性头颈部癌患者中每两个月使用西妥昔单抗的理由和预算影响。
Head Neck. 2019 Apr;41(4):908-914. doi: 10.1002/hed.25481. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
2
Safety and feasibility of every-other-week maintenance cetuximab after first-line chemotherapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer.在一线化疗后,每两周给予维持剂量西妥昔单抗治疗复发性或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌的安全性和可行性。
Head Neck. 2013 Oct;35(10):1471-4. doi: 10.1002/hed.23170. Epub 2012 Oct 6.
3
Budget impact of bimonthly use of cetuximab in patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer.每两个月使用西妥昔单抗治疗转移性结直肠癌患者的预算影响。
Future Oncol. 2019 Jun;15(18):2107-2112. doi: 10.2217/fon-2018-0904. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
4
Phase II clinical study of valproic acid plus cisplatin and cetuximab in recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of Head and Neck-V-CHANCE trial.丙戊酸联合顺铂和西妥昔单抗治疗复发和/或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌的II期临床研究-V-CHANCE试验
BMC Cancer. 2016 Nov 25;16(1):918. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2957-y.
5
Cetuximab for the treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.西妥昔单抗治疗复发性和/或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌。
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Oct;13 Suppl 3:49-54. doi: 10.3310/hta13suppl3/08.
6
Cetuximab plus platinum-based chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized, double-blind safety study comparing cetuximab produced from two manufacturing processes using the EXTREME study regimen.西妥昔单抗联合铂类化疗用于头颈部鳞状细胞癌:一项采用EXTREME研究方案比较两种生产工艺制备的西妥昔单抗的随机、双盲安全性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2016 Jan 14;16:19. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2064-0.
7
Clinical outcomes of platinum-based chemotherapy plus cetuximab for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: comparison between platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant patients.铂类化疗联合西妥昔单抗治疗复发或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌的临床疗效:铂敏感与铂耐药患者的比较
Acta Otolaryngol. 2019 Feb;139(2):201-205. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2018.1551623. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
8
Pembrolizumab versus methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab for recurrent or metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-040): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study.帕博利珠单抗对比甲氨蝶呤、多西他赛或西妥昔单抗用于治疗复发性或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌(KEYNOTE-040):一项随机、开放标签、III 期研究。
Lancet. 2019 Jan 12;393(10167):156-167. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31999-8. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
9
Phase II multicenter study of the antiepidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody cetuximab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with platinum-refractory metastatic and/or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.抗表皮生长因子受体单克隆抗体西妥昔单抗联合铂类化疗用于铂难治性转移性和/或复发性头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者的II期多中心研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 20;23(24):5568-77. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.119. Epub 2005 Jul 11.
10
Phase II trial of everolimus in patients with previously treated recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.依维莫司用于既往接受过治疗的复发性或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者的II期试验。
Head Neck. 2016 Dec;38(12):1759-1764. doi: 10.1002/hed.24501. Epub 2016 May 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploration of an alternative reconstructed individual patient data-based approach for budget impact analysis of anticancer drugs.探索一种基于个体患者数据重建的替代方法用于抗癌药物预算影响分析。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023 Jun 11;21(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12962-023-00447-7.
2
Biweekly administration of cetuximab in Japanese patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer.每周两次给予 Cetuximab 治疗复发或转移性头颈部癌的日本患者。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2022 Nov;27(11):1669-1674. doi: 10.1007/s10147-022-02226-5. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
3
Is the Scope of Costs Considered in Budget Impact Analyses for Anticancer Drugs Rational? A Systematic Review and Comparative Study.
抗癌药物预算影响分析中考虑的成本范围是否合理?系统评价和比较研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 5;9:777199. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.777199. eCollection 2021.