Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 10, 35043, Marburg, Germany.
Department of Thematic Studies - Environmental Change, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Environ Microbiol. 2019 May;21(5):1702-1717. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14535. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
The floodplain of the Amazon River is a large source for the greenhouse gas methane, but the soil microbial communities and processes involved are little known. We studied the structure and function of the methanogenic microbial communities in soils across different inundation regimes in the Cunia Reserve, encompassing nonflooded forest soil (dry forest), occasionally flooded Igapo soils (dry Igapo), long time flooded Igapo soils (wet Igapo) and sediments from Igarape streams (Igarape). We also investigated a Transect (four sites) from the water shoreline into the dry forest. The potential and resilience of the CH production process were studied in the original soil samples upon anaerobic incubation and again after artificial desiccation and rewetting. Bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA genes and methanogenic mcrA were always present in the soils, except in dry forest soils where mcrA increased only upon anaerobic incubation. NMDS analysis showed a clear effect of desiccation and rewetting treatments on both bacterial and archaeal communities. However, the effects of the different sites were less pronounced, with the exception of Igarape. After anaerobic incubation, methanogenic taxa became more abundant among the Archaea, while there was only little change among the Bacteria. Contribution of hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis was usually around 40%. After desiccation and rewetting, we found that Firmicutes, Methanocellales and Methanosarcinaceae became the dominant taxa, but rates and pathways of CH production stayed similar. Such change was also observed in soils from the Transects. The results indicate that microbial community structures of Amazonian soils will in general be strongly affected by flooding and drainage events, while differences between specific field sites will be comparatively minor.
亚马逊河漫滩是温室气体甲烷的一个重要来源,但土壤微生物群落及其相关过程仍知之甚少。我们研究了库尼亚保护区不同淹没区(包括未淹没的森林土壤(旱地森林)、偶尔被淹没的伊瓜波土壤(旱地伊瓜波)、长时间被淹没的伊瓜波土壤(湿地伊瓜波)和伊加拉佩溪流的沉积物(伊加拉佩))中土壤产甲烷微生物群落的结构和功能。我们还研究了从水岸到旱地森林的一个样带(四个地点)。我们在原始土壤样本中进行了厌氧培养,研究了 CH 生成过程的潜力和恢复能力,然后在人工干燥和再润湿后再次进行了研究。在土壤中,细菌和古菌 16S rRNA 基因和产甲烷 mcrA 总是存在的,除了在旱地森林土壤中,只有在厌氧培养时 mcrA 才会增加。NMDS 分析表明,干燥和再润湿处理对细菌和古菌群落都有明显的影响。然而,不同地点的影响则不太明显,除了伊加拉佩。厌氧培养后,产甲烷菌在古菌中变得更加丰富,而在细菌中则几乎没有变化。氢营养型产甲烷作用的贡献通常约为 40%。干燥和再润湿后,我们发现厚壁菌门、甲烷杆菌目和甲烷八叠球菌科成为主要分类群,但 CH 生成的速率和途径保持相似。在样带的土壤中也观察到了这种变化。结果表明,亚马逊土壤的微生物群落结构通常会受到洪水和排水事件的强烈影响,而特定现场之间的差异则相对较小。