Suppr超能文献

团结的失败:新结核病技术的研发和实施中的伦理挑战。

A failure in solidarity: Ethical challenges in the development and implementation of new tuberculosis technologies.

机构信息

Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Bioethics. 2019 Jun;33(5):557-567. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12554. Epub 2019 Jan 25.

Abstract

Prominent tuberculosis (TB) actors are invoking solidarity to motivate and justify collective action to address TB, including through intensified development and implementation (D&I) of technologies such as drugs and diagnostics. We characterize the ethical challenges associated with D&I of new TB technologies by drawing on stakeholder perspectives from 23 key informant interviews and we articulate the ethical implications of solidarity for TB technology D&I. The fundamental ethical issue facing TB technological D&I is a failure within and beyond the TB community to stand in solidarity with persons with TB in addressing the complex sociopolitical contexts of technological D&I. The failure in solidarity relates to two further ethical challenges raised by respondents: skewed power dynamics that hinder D&I and uncertainties around weighing risks and benefits associated with new technologies. Respondents identified advocacy and participatory research practices as necessary to address such challenges and to motivate sustained collective action to accelerate toward TB elimination. We present the first empirical examination of bioethical accounts of solidarity in public and global health. Our study suggests that solidarity allows us better to understand and address the ethical challenges that arrest the D&I of new TB technologies. Solidarity lends credence to policies and practices that address the relational nature of illness and health through collective action.

摘要

主要的结核病(TB)行动者呼吁团结一致,激励并证明集体行动的合理性,以解决结核病问题,包括通过加强药物和诊断等技术的开发和实施(D&I)。我们从 23 位关键意见访谈中汲取利益相关者的观点,描绘了新的结核病技术的 D&I 所涉及的伦理挑战,并阐述了团结对结核病技术 D&I 的伦理影响。结核病技术 D&I 所面临的基本伦理问题是,结核病界内外未能团结一致,共同解决技术 D&I 所涉及的复杂社会政治背景下的问题。团结的失败涉及到受访者提出的另外两个伦理挑战:阻碍 D&I 的权力失衡以及权衡新技术相关风险和收益的不确定性。受访者认为,倡导和参与性研究实践对于应对这些挑战和激励持续的集体行动以加速实现结核病消除是必要的。我们首次对团结的生物伦理学观点进行了实证检验,这种观点在公共和全球卫生领域中具有重要意义。我们的研究表明,团结使我们能够更好地理解和解决阻碍新的结核病技术 D&I 的伦理挑战。团结使我们更相信那些通过集体行动来解决疾病和健康的关系性质的政策和实践。

相似文献

1
A failure in solidarity: Ethical challenges in the development and implementation of new tuberculosis technologies.
Bioethics. 2019 Jun;33(5):557-567. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12554. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
2
Developing and Implementing new TB Technologies: Key Informants' Perspectives on the Ethical Challenges.
J Bioeth Inq. 2020 Mar;17(1):65-73. doi: 10.1007/s11673-019-09954-w. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
3
Solidarity and care as relational practices.
Bioethics. 2018 Nov;32(9):553-561. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12510. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
4
Reciprocity and Ethical Tuberculosis Treatment and Control.
J Bioeth Inq. 2016 Mar;13(1):75-86. doi: 10.1007/s11673-015-9691-z. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
6
Relational Ethics for Public Health: Interpreting Solidarity and Care.
Health Care Anal. 2019 Mar;27(1):4-12. doi: 10.1007/s10728-018-0363-0.
7
Solidarity in contemporary bioethics--towards a new approach.
Bioethics. 2012 Sep;26(7):343-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01987.x.
8
Mitochondrial Replacement Techniques : Examining Collective Representation in Emerging Technologies Governance.
J Bioeth Inq. 2018 Sep;15(3):381-392. doi: 10.1007/s11673-018-9873-6. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
9
The social determinants of health: key to global tuberculosis control.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2011 Jun;15 Suppl 2:30-36. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.10.0691.
10
Solidarity and Community Engagement in Global Health Research.
Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(5):43-56. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1745930.

引用本文的文献

1
Data Sharing During Pandemics: Reciprocity, Solidarity, and Limits to Obligations.
J Bioeth Inq. 2023 Dec;20(4):667-672. doi: 10.1007/s11673-023-10251-w. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
2
Solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from a nine-country interview study in Europe.
Med Humanit. 2023 Dec 19;49(4):511-520. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2022-012536.
3
Defining ethical challenge(s) in healthcare research: a rapid review.
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Sep 29;22(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00700-9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验