Suppr超能文献

大流行期间的数据共享:互惠、团结以及义务的限制。

Data Sharing During Pandemics: Reciprocity, Solidarity, and Limits to Obligations.

机构信息

Sydney Health Ethics, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Edward Ford Building, A27 Fisher Rd, Camperdown, New South Wales, 2006, Australia.

School of Health Studies & Rotman Institute of Philosophy, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, Ontario, N6A 3K7, Canada.

出版信息

J Bioeth Inq. 2023 Dec;20(4):667-672. doi: 10.1007/s11673-023-10251-w. Epub 2023 Jul 13.

Abstract

South Africa shared with the world the warning of a new strain of SARS-CoV2, Omicron, in November 2021. As a result, many high-income countries (HICs) instituted complete travel bans on persons leaving South Africa and other neighbouring countries. These bans were unnecessary from a scientific standpoint, and they ran counter to the International Health Regulations. In short, South Africa was penalized for sharing data. Data sharing during pandemics is commonly justified by appeals to solidarity. In this paper, we argue that solidarity is, at best, an aspirational ideal to work toward but that it cannot ground an obligation to share data. Instead, low-and-middle income countries (LIMCs) should be guided by the principle of reciprocity, which states that we ought to return good for good received. Reciprocity is necessarily a conditional principle. LMICs, we argue, should only share data during future pandemics on the condition that HICs provide enforceable assurances that the benefits of data sharing will be equitably distributed and that LMICs won't be penalized for sharing information.

摘要

南非于 2021 年 11 月向世界发出了 SARS-CoV2 的新型奥密克戎毒株的警告。因此,许多高收入国家(HICs)对离开南非和其他邻国的人实施了全面旅行禁令。从科学角度来看,这些禁令是不必要的,也违反了《国际卫生条例》。简而言之,南非因分享数据而受到惩罚。在大流行期间,数据共享通常以团结为理由。在本文中,我们认为,团结充其量只是一个努力实现的理想目标,但不能作为分享数据的义务的基础。相反,中低收入国家(LIMCs)应该以互惠原则为指导,即我们应该以德报德。互惠原则必然是有条件的原则。我们认为,LMICs 只有在 HICs 提供可执行的保证,即数据共享的利益将公平分配,并且 LMICs 不会因共享信息而受到惩罚的情况下,才应在未来的大流行期间共享数据。

相似文献

1
Data Sharing During Pandemics: Reciprocity, Solidarity, and Limits to Obligations.
J Bioeth Inq. 2023 Dec;20(4):667-672. doi: 10.1007/s11673-023-10251-w. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
2
Equitable data sharing in epidemics and pandemics.
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Oct 6;22(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00701-8.
3
Correction to: Data Sharing During Pandemics: Reciprocity, Solidarity, and Limits to Obligations.
J Bioeth Inq. 2023 Dec;20(4):673. doi: 10.1007/s11673-023-10307-x.
4
Rethinking solidarity towards equity in global health: African views.
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Mar 24;22(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01830-9.
7
Ethics and governance challenges related to genomic data sharing in southern Africa: the case of SARS-CoV-2.
Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Dec;10(12):e1855-e1859. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00417-X. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
10
Global Disparity and Solidarity in a Pandemic.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2020 May;50(3):65-67. doi: 10.1002/hast.1138.

引用本文的文献

2
Artificial intelligence for modelling infectious disease epidemics.
Nature. 2025 Feb;638(8051):623-635. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08564-w. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
3
Health security-Why is 'public health' not enough?
Glob Health Res Policy. 2025 Jan 3;10(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s41256-024-00394-7.
4
Stewardship and social justice: implications of using the precautionary principle to justify burdensome antimicrobial stewardship measures.
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2024 Dec;42(Suppl 1):1-15. doi: 10.1007/s40592-024-00224-z. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
5
For the Good of the Globe: Moral Reasons for States to Mitigate Global Catastrophic Biological Risks.
J Bioeth Inq. 2024 Sep;21(3):559-570. doi: 10.1007/s11673-024-10337-z. Epub 2024 Feb 8.

本文引用的文献

2
How we classify countries and people-and why it matters.
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Jun;7(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009704.
3
The use, misuse and overuse of the 'low-income and middle-income countries' category.
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Jun;7(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009067.
4
The political theatre of the UK's travel ban on South Africa.
Lancet. 2021 Dec 18;398(10318):2211-2213. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02752-5. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
5
Omicron-variant border bans ignore the evidence, say scientists.
Nature. 2021 Dec;600(7888):199. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-03608-x.
6
Equitable data sharing in epidemics and pandemics.
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Oct 6;22(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00701-8.
8
COVID-19: Putting the General Data Protection Regulation to the Test.
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 May 29;6(2):e19279. doi: 10.2196/19279.
9
A failure in solidarity: Ethical challenges in the development and implementation of new tuberculosis technologies.
Bioethics. 2019 Jun;33(5):557-567. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12554. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
10
Reciprocity and Ethical Tuberculosis Treatment and Control.
J Bioeth Inq. 2016 Mar;13(1):75-86. doi: 10.1007/s11673-015-9691-z. Epub 2016 Jan 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验