Department of Cardiac Surgery, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Jul;108(1):23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.12.028. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
Frailty has emerged as one of the main predictors of worse outcomes after cardiac surgery, but scarce evidence is available about its influence on postoperative quality of life. Whether frail patients may improve their quality of life or not after the surgical procedure is a matter that still remains unclear.
This observational and multicenter cohort study was conducted in 3 university-affiliated hospitals of three different regions of Spain (Madrid, Asturias, and Canary Islands). Patients were categorized into three ordinal levels of frailty (frail, prefrail, robust) using the Fried, FRAIL (fatigue, resistance, ambulation, illnesses, and loss of weight) scale, and Clinical Frailty Scale frailty scales. We analyzed the changes on health-related quality-of-life for each level of frailty using the EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5 Level questionnaire before and 6 months after the operation.
The study included 137 patients, and 109 completed the 6-month follow-up. Median age of the entire cohort was 78 years (interquartile interval, 72 to 83 years). Frailty prevalence varied between 10% and 29%, depending on which scale was used. There was a statistically significant linear trend in the incidence of death or major morbidity among the different levels of frailty. On one hand, robust patients did not show significant changes in their previously high score of quality of life during follow-up. On the other hand, frail and prefrail patients significantly improved their scores after the operation. These results were comparable regardless the scale used for frailty assessment.
Frail and prefrail patients have a significant improvement in their quality of life 6 months after their cardiac operation, and they have a proportionally greater increase in their postoperative health-related quality of life scores than robust patients.
衰弱已成为心脏手术后预后较差的主要预测因素之一,但关于其对术后生活质量的影响的证据很少。虚弱患者在手术后是否能够改善生活质量仍然不清楚。
本观察性多中心队列研究在西班牙三个不同地区(马德里、阿斯图里亚斯和加那利群岛)的 3 所大学附属医院进行。使用 Fried、FRAIL(疲劳、抵抗力、活动能力、疾病和体重减轻)量表和临床虚弱量表将患者分为衰弱的三个有序水平(虚弱、衰弱前期、健壮)。我们使用 EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5 Level 问卷分析了每个虚弱水平在手术前后 6 个月的健康相关生活质量变化。
该研究纳入了 137 名患者,其中 109 名完成了 6 个月的随访。整个队列的中位年龄为 78 岁(四分位间距,72 至 83 岁)。根据使用的量表不同,衰弱的患病率在 10%至 29%之间变化。在不同衰弱水平之间,死亡或主要发病率的发生率存在统计学上的线性趋势。一方面,健壮患者在随访期间其先前较高的生活质量评分没有显著变化。另一方面,虚弱和衰弱前期患者在手术后显著提高了他们的评分。这些结果与用于评估衰弱的量表无关。
虚弱和衰弱前期患者在心脏手术后 6 个月内生活质量有显著改善,并且他们的术后健康相关生活质量评分增加幅度比健壮患者更大。