van der Velden Kim E H M, Spaetgens Bart P A, Buhre Wolfgang F F A, Maesen Bart, de Korte-de Boer Dianne J D, van Kuijk Sander M J, van 't Hof Arnoud W J, Schreiber Jan U
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+ (MUMC+), 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Oct 18;11(10):333. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11100333.
Symptomatic aortic stenosis and frailty reduce health-related quality of life (HrQoL). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients at high to extreme risk has been proven to have a beneficial effect on HrQoL. Currently, TAVI is also considered in patients at intermediate risk. Our meta-analysis investigates whether benefits to HrQoL after TAVI is more pronounced in frail patients and patients at high to extreme vs. intermediate surgical risk. A systematic search of the literature was performed in November 2021 and updated in November 2023 in PUBMED, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. Statistical analysis was performed according to the inverse variance method and the random effects model. A total of 951 studies were assessed, of which 19 studies were included. Meta-analysis showed a mean increase in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score of 29.6 points (6.0, 33.1) in high to extreme risk patients versus 21.0 (20.9, 21.1) in intermediate risk patients ( < 0.00001) and 24.6 points (21.5, 27.8) in frail patients versus 26.8 (20.2, 33.4) in the general TAVI population ( = 0.55). However, qualitative analyses of non-randomized studies showed the opposite results. In conclusion, TAVI improves HrQoL more in high to extreme than intermediate risk patients. Frailty's impact on HrQoL post-TAVI is inconclusive due to varying outcomes in RCTs vs. non-RCTs.
有症状的主动脉瓣狭窄和身体虚弱会降低健康相关生活质量(HrQoL)。对于高风险至极高风险患者,经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)已被证明对HrQoL有有益影响。目前,中度风险患者也在考虑接受TAVI。我们的荟萃分析调查了TAVI术后对HrQoL的益处,在身体虚弱的患者以及高风险至极高风险与中度手术风险患者中是否更为显著。2021年11月对文献进行了系统检索,并于2023年11月在PUBMED、EMBASE和Cochrane对照试验注册库中进行了更新。根据逆方差法和随机效应模型进行统计分析。共评估了951项研究,其中19项研究被纳入。荟萃分析显示,高风险至极高风险患者的堪萨斯城心肌病问卷(KCCQ)评分平均增加29.6分(6.0,33.1),而中度风险患者为21.0分(20.9,21.1)(<0.00001);身体虚弱患者增加24.6分(21.5,27.8),而一般TAVI人群为26.8分(20.2,33.4)(P = 0.55)。然而,对非随机研究的定性分析显示了相反的结果。总之,TAVI对高风险至极高风险患者的HrQoL改善比对中度风险患者更明显。由于随机对照试验(RCT)与非随机对照试验(non - RCT)结果不同,身体虚弱对TAVI术后HrQoL的影响尚无定论。