Andreewa P, Huhn D, Thiel E, Rodt H
Blut. 1978 May 18;36(5):299-305. doi: 10.1007/BF01880680.
APh-activity and PAS-positive deposits were studied in 50 cases of ALL, classified as T-ALL and O-ALL according to immunological marker investigations. Correlation between morphological features of the cells and APh and PAS reactions, as well as between morphology and immunological markers was not detected. APh-activity in general was stronger in T-ALL (R+ and R-), while PAS-content was more pronounced in O-ALL. The results suggest that cytochemical methods, especially APh and PAS reaction, are valuable to distinguish T-ALL from O-ALL but not reliable enough to replace immunological marker investigations.
对50例急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)患者进行了酸性磷酸酶(APh)活性和过碘酸雪夫(PAS)阳性沉积物的研究,根据免疫标志物检测将其分为T细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病(T-ALL)和普通型急性淋巴细胞白血病(O-ALL)。未检测到细胞形态特征与APh和PAS反应之间以及形态与免疫标志物之间的相关性。总体而言,T-ALL(R+和R-)中的APh活性更强,而O-ALL中的PAS含量更明显。结果表明,细胞化学方法,尤其是APh和PAS反应,对于区分T-ALL和O-ALL有价值,但不足以可靠地取代免疫标志物检测。