Laboratory of Microbiology and Biotechnology of Foods, Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, Athens 11855, Greece.
Laboratory of Food Chemistry and Analysis, Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, Athens 11855, Greece.
Meat Sci. 2019 May;151:43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
Beef, pork and mixed (70% beef and 30% pork) minced meat samples were obtained from a meat processing plant in Athens during a two-year survey and analyzed both microbiologically and by headspace solid-phase microextraction in combination with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME/GC-MS). A validated method for the discrimination of minced meat was developed based on the volatile fingerprints. Unsupervised (PCA) and supervised (PLS-DA) multivariate statistical methods were applied to visualize, group and classify the samples. The data-set was divided 70% for model calibration and 30% for model prediction. During model calibration 99, 100 and 100% of the samples were correctly classified as beef, pork and mixed meat samples, respectively, while for model prediction the respective percentages were 100, 100 and 95% respectively. In both datasets, the overall correct classification rate amounted to 99% on average. Among the volatile compounds identified, heptanal, octanal, butanol, pentanol, hexanol, octanol, 1-penten-3-ol, 2-octen-1-ol, 3-hydroxy-2-butanone, 2-butanone and 2-heptanone were positively correlated with beef samples. Furthermore, pentanal, hexanal, decanal, nonanal, benzaldehyde, trans-2-hexenal, trans-2-heptenal, trans-2-octenal and 1-octen-3-one were positively correlated with pork. Lastly, the alcohols, 2-butanol and 1-octen-3-ol showed positive correlation with mixed samples. The results indicated that the volatilomics approach employed in this study could be used as an alternative method for robust and reliable discrimination and classification of meat samples in an off-line mode.
在为期两年的调查中,从雅典的一家肉类加工厂获得了牛肉、猪肉和混合(70%牛肉和 30%猪肉)绞肉样本,并对其进行了微生物分析和顶空固相微萃取结合气相色谱-质谱联用(HS-SPME/GC-MS)分析。基于挥发性指纹,开发了一种用于区分绞肉的验证方法。应用无监督(PCA)和有监督(PLS-DA)多元统计方法对样品进行可视化、分组和分类。数据集分为 70%用于模型校准,30%用于模型预测。在校准模型期间,99%、100%和 100%的样品分别正确分类为牛肉、猪肉和混合肉样品,而在预测模型中,相应的百分比分别为 100%、100%和 95%。在两个数据集的平均情况下,总体正确分类率达到 99%。在所鉴定的挥发性化合物中,庚醛、辛醛、正丁醇、戊醇、正己醇、辛醇、1-戊烯-3-醇、2-辛烯-1-醇、3-羟基-2-丁酮、2-丁酮和 2-庚酮与牛肉样品呈正相关。此外,戊醛、己醛、癸醛、壬醛、苯甲醛、反式-2-己烯醛、反式-2-庚烯醛、反式-2-辛烯醛和 1-辛烯-3-酮与猪肉呈正相关。最后,醇类、2-丁醇和 1-辛烯-3-醇与混合样品呈正相关。结果表明,本研究中采用的挥发组学方法可作为一种替代方法,用于离线模式下肉类样品的稳健可靠鉴别和分类。