A review of cyclic testing protocols for flexor tendon repairs.

BACKGROUND

Cyclic testing of flexor tendons aims to simulate post-operative rehabilitation and is more rigorous than static testing. However, there are many different protocols, making comparisons difficult. We reviewed these protocols and suggested two protocols that simulate passive and active mobilization.

METHODS

Literature search was performed to look for cyclic testing protocols used to evaluate flexor tendon repairs. Preload, cyclic load, number of cycles, frequency and displacement rate were categorised.

FINDINGS

Thirty-five studies with 42 different protocols were included. Thirty-one protocols were single-staged, while 11 protocols were multiple-staged. Twenty-nine out of 42 protocols used preload, ranging from 0.2 to 5 N. Preload of 2 N was used in most protocols. The cyclic load that was most commonly used was between 11 and 20 N. Cyclic load with increment of 10 N after each stage was used in multiple-staged protocols. The most commonly used number of cycles was between 100 and 1000. Most protocols used a frequency of <1 Hz and displacement rate between 0 and 20 mm/min.

INTERPRETATION

We propose two single-staged protocols as examples. Protocol 1: cyclic load of 15 N to simulate passive mobilization with preload of 2 N and 2000 cycles at frequency of 0.2 Hz.; Protocol 2: cyclic load of 38 N to simulate active mobilization, with the same preload, number of cycles, and frequency as above. This review consolidates the current understanding of cyclic testing and may help clinicians and investigators improve the design of flexor tendon repairs, allow for comparisons of different repairs using the same protocol, and evaluate flexor tendon repairs more rigorously before clinical applications.