• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估 2013 年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会脂质指南发布后他汀类药物处方模式的变化。

Assessing Changes in Statin Prescribing Patterns Surrounding the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Lipid Guidelines.

机构信息

Campbell University College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, Buies Creek, NC, USA; Harnett Health System, Lillington, NC, USA.

Campbell University College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, Buies Creek, NC, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2019 Feb;41(2):314-321. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.12.017. Epub 2019 Jan 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.12.017
PMID:30686571
Abstract

PURPOSE

The American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) introduced new lipid guidelines in late 2013 that were a vast departure from older guidelines. Concerns were raised regarding the likely increase in the number of adults who would be eligible for lipid-lowering therapy, namely moderate to high intensity statins. We sought to determine whether, in the first year after the ACC/AHA guideline release, more patients were prescribed statins, prescribed moderate- to high-intensity statins, and eligible for statins compared with the previous year.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective, cross-sectional, observational analysis of National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey collected by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention during the years 2013 and 2014. Survey participants who were younger than 40 years or older than 75 years, were pregnant, or had triglyceride levels ≥400 mg/dL were excluded. Descriptive analyses and χ tests of homogeneity (and associated odds ratios [ORs] and CIs) were constructed and reported.

FINDINGS

Compared with 2013, a higher percentage of patients in 2014 were prescribed a statin and were eligible to receive a statin. In fact, patients in 2014 were significantly more likely to be prescribed a statin (OR = 1.22; 95% CI, 1.00-1.48) and to be eligible for a statin (OR = 9.26, 95% CI 7.54-11.37) compared with 2013. Although a higher percentage of patients in 2014 were prescribed a higher-intensity statin, the difference was not statistically significant (OR = 1.17; 95% CI, 0.90-1.52).

IMPLICATIONS

In the first year after the ACC/AHA guideline introduction, more patients in the United States were prescribed a statin. However, it is unclear whether the new guidelines were strictly adhered to regarding intensity of statin therapy.

摘要

目的

美国心脏病学会(ACC)和美国心脏协会(AHA)于 2013 年末发布了新的血脂指南,与旧指南相比有了很大的改变。人们担心接受降脂治疗的成年人数量会增加,即中高强度他汀类药物。我们旨在确定在 ACC/AHA 指南发布后的第一年,与前一年相比,是否有更多的患者接受了他汀类药物治疗、中高强度他汀类药物治疗以及有资格接受他汀类药物治疗。

方法

本研究是对疾病控制与预防中心在 2013 年和 2014 年收集的全国门诊医疗保健调查的回顾性、横断面、观察性分析。排除年龄小于 40 岁或大于 75 岁、怀孕或三酰甘油水平≥400mg/dL 的调查参与者。构建并报告描述性分析和同质性 χ 检验(以及相关的比值比[OR]和置信区间[CI])。

结果

与 2013 年相比,2014 年接受他汀类药物治疗的患者比例和有资格接受他汀类药物治疗的患者比例均较高。事实上,与 2013 年相比,2014 年患者接受他汀类药物治疗的可能性显著更高(OR=1.22;95%CI,1.00-1.48),有资格接受他汀类药物治疗的可能性更高(OR=9.26,95%CI 7.54-11.37)。尽管 2014 年接受高强度他汀类药物治疗的患者比例较高,但差异无统计学意义(OR=1.17;95%CI,0.90-1.52)。

意义

在 ACC/AHA 指南发布后的第一年,美国有更多的患者接受了他汀类药物治疗。然而,尚不清楚新指南在他汀类药物治疗强度方面是否得到严格遵守。

相似文献

1
Assessing Changes in Statin Prescribing Patterns Surrounding the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Lipid Guidelines.评估 2013 年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会脂质指南发布后他汀类药物处方模式的变化。
Clin Ther. 2019 Feb;41(2):314-321. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.12.017. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
2
Implications of American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Cholesterol Guidelines on Statin Underutilization for Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Diabetes Mellitus Among Several US Networks of Community Health Centers.美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会(ACC/AHA)胆固醇指南对几种美国社区卫生中心网络中糖尿病患者心血管疾病预防中他汀类药物未充分利用的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jul 3;6(7):e005627. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005627.
3
Initiation Patterns of Statins in the 2 Years After Release of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Cholesterol Management Guideline in a Large US Health Plan.2013年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会(ACC/AHA)胆固醇管理指南发布后两年内,美国一项大型医保计划中他汀类药物的起始使用模式
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 May 4;6(5):e005205. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.005205.
4
Impact of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association cholesterol guidelines on the prescription of high-intensity statins in patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome or stroke.2013年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会胆固醇指南对因急性冠状动脉综合征或中风住院患者高强度他汀类药物处方的影响。
Am Heart J. 2016 Nov;181:130-136. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.07.024. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
5
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Class I Guidelines for the Treatment of Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk: Implications for US Hispanics/Latinos Based on Findings From the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL).美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会(ACC/AHA)降低动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险的胆固醇治疗I类指南:基于西班牙裔社区健康研究/拉丁裔研究(HCHS/SOL)结果对美国西班牙裔/拉丁裔的影响
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 May 11;6(5):e005045. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.005045.
6
Adoption of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Cholesterol Management Guideline in Cardiology Practices Nationwide.全美心脏病学实践中对 2013 年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会胆固醇管理指南的采用。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Apr 1;2(4):361-369. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.5922.
7
Increases in statin eligibility to reduce cardiovascular risk according to the 2013 ACC/AHA cholesterol guidelines in the Africa Middle East region: a sub-analysis of the Africa Middle East Cardiovascular Epidemiological (ACE) study.根据2013年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会(ACC/AHA)胆固醇指南,在非洲中东地区提高他汀类药物适用标准以降低心血管风险:非洲中东心血管流行病学(ACE)研究的一项亚组分析
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Mar 15;19(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1034-2.
8
Evaluation of Statin Prescribing for Secondary Prevention in Primary Care Following New Guideline Recommendations.新指南建议下基层医疗中他汀类药物二级预防处方的评估
Ann Pharmacother. 2016 Jan;50(1):17-21. doi: 10.1177/1060028015608199. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
9
Comparison of Recommended Eligibility for Primary Prevention Statin Therapy Based on the US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations vs the ACC/AHA Guidelines.基于美国预防服务工作组建议与美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会指南的一级预防他汀类药物治疗推荐资格比较。
JAMA. 2017 Apr 18;317(15):1563-1567. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.3416.
10
Evaluation of Statin Eligibility, Prescribing Practices, and Therapeutic Responses Using ATP III, ACC/AHA, and NLA Dyslipidemia Treatment Guidelines in a Large Urban Cohort of HIV-Infected Outpatients.使用 ATP III、ACC/AHA 和 NLA 血脂异常治疗指南评估大样本城市 HIV 感染门诊患者的他汀类药物适用性、处方实践和治疗反应。
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2018 Feb;32(2):58-69. doi: 10.1089/apc.2017.0304.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends and determinants of prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of dyslipidaemia in canton of Geneva, 2005-2019: Potent statins are underused.2005 - 2019年日内瓦州血脂异常患病率、知晓率、治疗率和控制率的趋势及决定因素:强效他汀类药物未得到充分利用。
Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2023 May 19;18:200187. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2023.200187. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Current Practices and Gaps in Management of Dyslipidemia in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) in Accordance with American Diabetes Association (ADA) Guidelines: A Subset Analysis from a Real-World, Cross-Sectional Observational Study (LEADD Study).根据美国糖尿病协会(ADA)指南,2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者血脂异常管理的现状与差距:一项来自真实世界横断面观察性研究(LEADD研究)的亚组分析
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2021 Jun 15;14:2693-2700. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S294842. eCollection 2021.
3
Gaps in Dyslipidemia Care Among Working-Aged Individuals With Employer-Sponsored Health Care.工作年龄段人群中存在血脂异常管理差距,他们拥有雇主提供的医疗保险。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 May 5;9(9):e015807. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015807. Epub 2020 Apr 22.