Winters Zoe Ellen, Bernaudo Lorenzo
Breast Cancer Surgery, Patient-Centred and Clinical Outcomes Research Group, Surgical and Interventional Trials Unit, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Breast Care Unit, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK.
Gland Surg. 2018 Dec;7(6):525-535. doi: 10.21037/gs.2018.07.01.
The oncological safety of treating multiple ipsilateral breast cancers (MIBCs) with types of breast conserving surgery (BCS) compared to mastectomy remains uncertain. This is predicated on the absence of any randomised controlled trials or high-quality protocol defined prospective cohort studies. A single recently published systematic review by the first author, reports its summarised results in this review. Fundamentally the important question is the evaluation of clinical safety following BCS compared to mastectomy for treating MIBC, which is reported in only six studies. Consequently, current evidence doesn't support the latest St Gallen consensus suggesting the possibility of using BCS to treat all MIBC. There is minimal comparative outcomes data on multicentric (MC) cancers compared to multifocal (MF) cancers comparing BCS or mastectomy. There is also poor evidence of clinical outcomes following therapeutic mammoplasty (TM) for MIBC compared to mastectomy. The potential recommendation of two potential radiotherapy boosts to separate lumpectomy sites following BCS for MC cancers remains a novel treatment concept whose feasibility will be evaluated in the forthcoming NIHR funded randomised feasibility trial called MIAMI. This is a world first attempt to assess the feasibility of a randomised trial design alongside the on-going Alliance registry study (ACOSOG, American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z11102) in the USA, in which there is no comparative evaluation of mastectomy outcomes. The MIAMI trial aims to assess the clinical safety of multiple lumpectomies combined with TM compared to the standard of mastectomy in MIBC stratified by MF or MC cancers. There is limited evidence on the impacts of inter-tumoral heterogeneity relating to breast cancer subtypes in relation to individualised treatments and recommendations for types of breast surgery. Recent studies have highlighted the potential contributions of stromal epigenetic changes that are currently poorly understood regarding their contributions to either clinical unifocal or MF cancers.
与乳房切除术相比,采用不同类型的保乳手术(BCS)治疗多灶性同侧乳腺癌(MIBC)的肿瘤学安全性仍不确定。这是基于缺乏任何随机对照试验或高质量方案定义的前瞻性队列研究。第一作者最近发表的一项系统评价在本综述中报告了其总结结果。从根本上说,重要的问题是评估与乳房切除术相比,BCS治疗MIBC后的临床安全性,目前仅有六项研究报道了这方面内容。因此,目前的证据不支持最新的圣加仑共识所提出的使用BCS治疗所有MIBC的可能性。与多灶性(MF)癌症相比,关于多中心(MC)癌症采用BCS或乳房切除术的比较结果数据极少。与乳房切除术相比,关于MIBC采用治疗性乳房成形术(TM)后的临床结果的证据也不足。对于MC癌症,在BCS后对两个不同的肿块切除部位进行两次潜在放疗增强的潜在建议仍是一个新的治疗概念,其可行性将在即将开展的由英国国家卫生研究院资助的名为MIAMI的随机可行性试验中进行评估。这是首次尝试评估随机试验设计的可行性,同时美国正在进行联盟注册研究(ACOSOG,美国外科医师肿瘤学会Z11102组),该研究未对乳房切除术的结果进行比较评估。MIAMI试验旨在评估与乳房切除术这一标准治疗相比,在按MF或MC癌症分层的MIBC中,多次肿块切除术联合TM的临床安全性。关于肿瘤间异质性对乳腺癌亚型个体化治疗及乳房手术类型建议的影响,证据有限。最近的研究强调了基质表观遗传变化的潜在作用,目前对其在临床单灶性或MF癌症中的作用了解甚少。