• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挪威版手术患者安全系统(SURPASS)与世界卫生组织手术安全核对表(WHO SSC)相结合的验证。

Validation of a Norwegian version of SURgical PAtient Safety System (SURPASS) in combination with the World Health Organizations' Surgical Safety Checklist (WHO SSC).

作者信息

Storesund Anette, Haugen Arvid Steinar, Wæhle Hilde Valen, Mahesparan Rupavathana, Boermeester Marja A, Nortvedt Monica Wammen, Søfteland Eirik

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Jan 7;8(1):e000488. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000488. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000488
PMID:30687799
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6327875/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Surgical safety checklists may contribute to reduction of complications and mortality. The WHO's Surgical Safety Checklist (WHO SSC) could prevent incidents in operating theatres, but errors also occur before and after surgery. The SURgical PAtient Safety System (SURPASS) is designed to intercept errors with use of checklists throughout the surgical pathway.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to validate a Norwegian version of the SURPASS' preoperative and postoperative checklists for use in combination with the already established Sign In, Time Out and Sign Out parts of the WHO SSC.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The validation of the SURPASS checklists content followed WHOs recommended guidelines. The process consisted of six steps: forward translation; testing the content; focus groups; expert panels; back translation; and approval of the final version. Qualitative content analysis was used to identify codes and categories for adaption of the SURPASS checklist items throughout Norwegian surgical care. Content validity index (CVI) was used by expert panels to score the relevance of each checklist item. The study was carried out in a neurosurgical ward in a large tertiary teaching hospital in Norway.

RESULTS

Testing the preoperative and postoperative SURPASS checklists was performed in 29 neurosurgical procedures. This involved all professional groups in the entire surgical patient care pathway. Eight clinical focus groups revealed two main categories: 'Adapt the wording to fit clinical practice' and 'The checklist items challenge existing workflow'. Interprofessional scoring of the content validity of the checklists reached >80% for all the SURPASS checklists.

CONCLUSIONS

The first version of the SURPASS checklists combined with the WHO SSC was validated for use in Norwegian surgical care with face validity confirmed and CVI >0.80%.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01872195.

摘要

引言

手术安全核对表可能有助于减少并发症和死亡率。世界卫生组织的手术安全核对表(WHO SSC)可预防手术室中的事故,但手术前后也会出现错误。手术患者安全系统(SURPASS)旨在通过在整个手术过程中使用核对表来拦截错误。

目的

我们旨在验证挪威版的SURPASS术前和术后核对表,以便与已确立的WHO SSC的签到、暂停和签出部分结合使用。

方法和材料

SURPASS核对表内容的验证遵循世界卫生组织推荐的指南。该过程包括六个步骤:正向翻译;测试内容;焦点小组;专家小组;反向翻译;以及最终版本的批准。采用定性内容分析法确定代码和类别,以调整SURPASS核对表项目,使其适用于挪威的外科护理。专家小组使用内容效度指数(CVI)对每个核对表项目的相关性进行评分。该研究在挪威一家大型三级教学医院的神经外科病房进行。

结果

在29例神经外科手术中对术前和术后的SURPASS核对表进行了测试。这涉及整个手术患者护理路径中的所有专业组。八个临床焦点小组揭示了两个主要类别:“调整措辞以适应临床实践”和“核对表项目对现有工作流程构成挑战”。所有SURPASS核对表的核对表内容效度的跨专业评分均达到80%以上。

结论

SURPASS核对表的第一版与WHO SSC结合使用,已在挪威外科护理中得到验证,表面效度得到确认,CVI>80%。

试验注册号

NCT01872195。

相似文献

1
Validation of a Norwegian version of SURgical PAtient Safety System (SURPASS) in combination with the World Health Organizations' Surgical Safety Checklist (WHO SSC).挪威版手术患者安全系统(SURPASS)与世界卫生组织手术安全核对表(WHO SSC)相结合的验证。
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Jan 7;8(1):e000488. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000488. eCollection 2019.
2
Clinical Efficacy of Combined Surgical Patient Safety System and the World Health Organization's Checklists in Surgery: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.联合手术患者安全系统和世界卫生组织清单在外科手术中的临床疗效:一项非随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jul 1;155(7):562-570. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0989.
3
Measuring variation in use of the WHO surgical safety checklist in the operating room: a multicenter prospective cross-sectional study.衡量手术室中世界卫生组织手术安全核对表使用情况的差异:一项多中心前瞻性横断面研究。
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Jan;220(1):1-11.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.09.021. Epub 2014 Oct 12.
4
The World Health Organisation's Surgical Safety Checklist in Belgian Operating Theatres: a Content-Driven Evaluation.世界卫生组织手术安全核对表在比利时手术室的应用:一项基于内容的评估。
Acta Chir Belg. 2015 Mar-Apr;115(2):147-54. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2015.11681085.
5
World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist Modification: Do Changes Emphasize Communication and Teamwork?世界卫生组织手术安全核对表修订版:强调沟通和团队合作的改变?
J Surg Res. 2020 Feb;246:614-622. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.035. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
6
Nature and timing of incidents intercepted by the SURPASS checklist in surgical patients.手术患者中被 SURPASS 清单拦截的事件的性质和时间。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jun;21(6):503-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000347. Epub 2012 Mar 23.
7
Impact of the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist on Patient Safety.世界卫生组织手术安全核对表对患者安全的影响。
Anesthesiology. 2019 Aug;131(2):420-425. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002674.
8
Use of surgical safety checklists in Australian operating theatres: an observational study.澳大利亚手术室中手术安全检查表的使用:一项观察性研究。
ANZ J Surg. 2017 Dec;87(12):971-975. doi: 10.1111/ans.13638. Epub 2016 May 25.
9
When a checklist is not enough: How to improve them and what else is needed.当检查表不够用时:如何改进它们以及还需要什么。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Aug;152(2):585-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.01.022. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
10
[A surgical safety checklist implementation: experience of a start-up phase of a collaborative project in hospitals of Catalonia, Spain].[手术安全核对表的实施:西班牙加泰罗尼亚地区医院合作项目启动阶段的经验]
Med Clin (Barc). 2014 Jul;143 Suppl 1:17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2014.07.007.

引用本文的文献

1
The combined application of Mini-CEX and Check-list Scales in enhancing clinical competence among emergency and critical care residents: a comparative study.迷你临床演练评估(Mini-CEX)与检查表量表联合应用对提高急诊与重症监护住院医师临床能力的效果:一项对比研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 11;12:1492206. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1492206. eCollection 2025.
2
Bridging the gap: assessing public understanding of medical terms in Saudi arabia's multilingual healthcare context.弥合差距:评估沙特阿拉伯多语言医疗环境下公众对医学术语的理解
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):989. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07600-1.
3
A Qualitative Investigation of Factors Affecting Saudi Patients' Communication Experience with Non-Saudi Physicians in Saudi Arabia.

本文引用的文献

1
Causal Analysis of World Health Organization's Surgical Safety Checklist Implementation Quality and Impact on Care Processes and Patient Outcomes: Secondary Analysis From a Large Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in Norway.世界卫生组织手术安全清单实施质量及其对护理过程和患者结局影响的因果分析:挪威一项大型梯次楔形集群随机对照试验的二次分析。
Ann Surg. 2019 Feb;269(2):283-290. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002584.
2
Intelligent dynamic clinical checklists improved checklist compliance in the intensive care unit.智能动态临床检查表提高了重症监护病房的检查表依从性。
Br J Anaesth. 2017 Aug 1;119(2):231-238. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex129.
3
沙特阿拉伯影响沙特患者与非沙特医生沟通体验的因素的定性研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Dec 30;11(1):118. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11010118.
4
Clinical Efficacy of Combined Surgical Patient Safety System and the World Health Organization's Checklists in Surgery: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.联合手术患者安全系统和世界卫生组织清单在外科手术中的临床疗效:一项非随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jul 1;155(7):562-570. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0989.
Preventing Complications: The Preflight Checklist.
预防并发症:飞行前检查清单
Eur Urol Focus. 2016 Apr;2(1):60-62. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.01.014. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
4
Implementation Science: A Neglected Opportunity to Accelerate Improvements in the Safety and Quality of Surgical Care.实施科学:加快提高外科护理安全性和质量的被忽视的机会。
Ann Surg. 2017 Jun;265(6):1104-1112. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002013.
5
Impact of workflow on the use of the Surgical Safety Checklist: a qualitative study.工作流程对手术安全核查表使用的影响:一项定性研究。
ANZ J Surg. 2016 Nov;86(11):864-867. doi: 10.1111/ans.13433. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
6
Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of surgical safety checklists: a systematic review of the qualitative evidence.与手术安全核对表实施相关的障碍和促进因素:定性证据的系统评价
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Dec;24(12):776-86. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004021. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
7
A qualitative evaluation of the barriers and facilitators toward implementation of the WHO surgical safety checklist across hospitals in England: lessons from the "Surgical Checklist Implementation Project".对英格兰各医院实施世界卫生组织手术安全核对表的障碍和促进因素的定性评估:“手术核对表实施项目”的经验教训
Ann Surg. 2015 Jan;261(1):81-91. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000793.
8
Effect of the World Health Organization checklist on patient outcomes: a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial.世界卫生组织检查表对患者结局的影响:一项阶梯式楔形整群随机对照试验
Ann Surg. 2015 May;261(5):821-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000716.
9
The checklist conundrum.清单难题。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 13;370(11):1063-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1315851.
10
Do safety checklists improve teamwork and communication in the operating room? A systematic review.安全检查表是否能提高手术室的团队合作和沟通?系统评价。
Ann Surg. 2013 Dec;258(6):856-71. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000206.