遵循《综合报告试验标准》(CONSORT)指南报告大麻素治疗慢性疼痛试验中的安全性结果:一项系统评价方案
Adherence to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Guidelines for Reporting Safety Outcomes in Trials of Cannabinoids for Chronic Pain: Protocol for a Systematic Review.
作者信息
Mohiuddin Mohammed M, Mizubuti Glenio, Haroutounian Simon, Smith Shannon, Campbell Fiona, Park Rex, Gilron Ian
机构信息
Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Washington University Pain Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
出版信息
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Jan 28;8(1):e11637. doi: 10.2196/11637.
BACKGROUND
Chronic pain affects a significant proportion of the population and presents a major challenge to clinicians and pain specialists. Despite the availability of pharmacologic treatment options such as opioids, many patients continue to experience persistent pain. Cannabinoids present an alternative option with some data on efficacy; however, to date, a systematic review of adverse events (AEs) assessment and reporting in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involving cannabinoids has not been performed. As a result, it is unclear whether a clear profile of cannabinoid-associated AEs has been accurately detailed in the literature. As cannabinoids are likely to become readily available for patients in the near future, it is important to study how well AEs have been reported in trials so that the safety profile of cannabinoids can be better understood.
OBJECTIVE
With a potentially enormous shift toward cannabinoid use for managing chronic pain and spasticity, this study aims to reveal the adequacy of AE reporting and cannabinoid-specific AEs in this setting. Spasticity is a major contributor to chronic pain in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), with a comorbidity of 75%. Many cannabinoid studies have been performed in MS-related painful spasticity with relevant pain outcomes, and these studies will be included in this review for comprehensiveness. The primary outcome will be the quality of AE assessment and reporting by adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines. Secondary outcomes will include the type of AE, method of AE reporting, severity of AE, frequency of AEs, patient withdrawals, and reasons for withdrawals.
METHODS
We will perform a systematic review by searching for primary reports of double-blind, randomized controlled trials of cannabinoids compared with placebo and any active comparator treatments for chronic pain, with a primary outcome directly related to pain (eg, pain intensity, pain relief, and pain-related interference). We will search the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO. RevMan software will be used for meta-analysis.
RESULTS
The protocol has been registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42018100401). The project was funded in 2018 and screening has been completed. Data extraction is under way and the first results are expected to be submitted for publication in January or February 2019.
CONCLUSIONS
This review will better elucidate the safety of cannabinoids for the treatment of chronic pain and spasticity through identifying gaps in the literature for AE reporting. Like in any new therapy, it is essential that accurate information surrounding the safety and efficacy of cannabinoids be clearly outlined and identified to balance the benefit and harm described for patients.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42018100401; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=100401.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/11637.
背景
慢性疼痛影响着相当一部分人群,给临床医生和疼痛专家带来了重大挑战。尽管有阿片类药物等药物治疗选择,但许多患者仍持续遭受疼痛。大麻素提供了一种替代选择,且有一些关于其疗效的数据;然而,迄今为止,尚未对涉及大麻素的随机临床试验(RCT)中的不良事件(AE)评估和报告进行系统评价。因此,尚不清楚大麻素相关不良事件的清晰概况是否已在文献中得到准确详述。由于大麻素在不久的将来可能会很容易地提供给患者,研究试验中不良事件的报告情况以便更好地了解大麻素的安全性概况非常重要。
目的
鉴于大麻素用于管理慢性疼痛和痉挛的使用可能会发生巨大转变,本研究旨在揭示在这种情况下不良事件报告的充分性以及大麻素特异性不良事件。痉挛是多发性硬化症(MS)患者慢性疼痛的主要原因,合并率为75%。许多关于大麻素的研究是在与MS相关的疼痛性痉挛中进行的,并得出了相关的疼痛结果,这些研究将被纳入本综述以确保全面性。主要结局将是根据《报告试验的统一标准》(CONSORT)指南评估和报告不良事件的质量。次要结局将包括不良事件的类型、不良事件报告方法、不良事件的严重程度、不良事件的发生频率、患者退出情况以及退出原因。
方法
我们将通过搜索大麻素与安慰剂及任何活性对照治疗用于慢性疼痛的双盲、随机对照试验的原始报告进行系统评价,其主要结局与疼痛直接相关(例如,疼痛强度、疼痛缓解和疼痛相关干扰)。我们将搜索以下数据库:MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和PsycINFO。RevMan软件将用于荟萃分析。
结果
该方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(CRD42018100401)注册。该项目于2018年获得资助,筛选工作已完成。数据提取正在进行中,预计第一批结果将于2019年1月或2月提交发表。
结论
本综述将通过识别文献中不良事件报告的差距,更好地阐明大麻素治疗慢性疼痛和痉挛的安全性。与任何新疗法一样,必须清楚地概述和确定围绕大麻素安全性和有效性的准确信息,以平衡对患者描述的益处和危害。
试验注册
PROSPERO CRD42018100401;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=100401。
国际注册报告识别码(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/11637。
相似文献
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021-5-17
J Integr Complement Med. 2024-6
引用本文的文献
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2021-4
本文引用的文献
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018-5
Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2017-6-1
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016-8
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-10-29
Pain. 2015-6
Assist Inferm Ric. 2014