Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Departament de Farmacologia, Terapèutica i Toxicologia, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol and Institut de Recerca Germans Trias i Pujol, Servei de Farmacologia Clínica, Badalona, Spain.
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Oct 5;1(6):e183485. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.3485.
Cannabinoids have antispastic and analgesic effects; however, their role in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) symptoms is not well defined.
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and tolerability of medicinal cannabinoids compared with placebo in the symptomatic treatment of patients with MS.
MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library Plus up to July 26, 2016. No restrictions were applied. The search was completed with information from ClinicalTrials.gov.
Randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trials evaluating the effect of medicinal cannabinoids by oral or oromucosal route of administration on the symptoms of spasticity, pain, or bladder dysfunction in adult patients with MS.
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines were followed. Effect sizes were calculated as standardized mean difference (SMD) for efficacy, and rate ratio (RR) for tolerability. Within each study, those SMDs evaluating the same outcome were combined before the meta-analysis to obtain a single value per outcome and study. Pooling of the studies was performed on an intention-to-treat basis by means of random-effect meta-analysis.
Spasticity (on the Ashworth and Modified Ashworth scales and subjective), pain, bladder dysfunction, adverse events, and withdrawals due to adverse events.
Seventeen selected trials including 3161 patients were analyzed. Significant findings for the efficacy of cannabinoids vs placebo were SMD = -0.25 SD (95% CI, -0.38 to -0.13 SD) for spasticity (subjective patient assessment data), -0.17 SD (95% CI, -0.31 to -0.03 SD) for pain, and -0.11 SD (95% CI, -0.22 to -0.0008 SD) for bladder dysfunction. Results favored cannabinoids. Findings for tolerability were RR = 1.72 patient-years (95% CI, 1.46-2.02 patient-years) in the total adverse events analysis and 2.95 patient-years (95% CI, 2.14-4.07 patient-years) in withdrawals due to adverse events. Results described a higher risk for cannabinoids. The serious adverse events meta-analysis showed no statistical significance.
The results suggest a limited efficacy of cannabinoids for the treatment of spasticity, pain, and bladder dysfunction in patients with MS. Therapy using these drugs can be considered as safe.
PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42014015391.
大麻素具有抗痉挛和镇痛作用;然而,它们在多发性硬化症(MS)症状治疗中的作用尚未得到明确界定。
进行系统评价和荟萃分析,评估药用大麻素与安慰剂相比在治疗多发性硬化症患者症状方面的疗效和耐受性。
MEDLINE 和 Cochrane 图书馆加至 2016 年 7 月 26 日。未应用任何限制。检索还结合了 ClinicalTrials.gov 的信息。
评估药用大麻素通过口服或口腔途径给药对成人多发性硬化症患者痉挛、疼痛或膀胱功能障碍症状的影响的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)报告准则。通过标准化均数差(SMD)评估疗效,通过率比(RR)评估耐受性。在每项研究中,对评估相同结局的那些 SMD 进行组合,以便为每个结局和研究获得单个值。基于意向治疗进行研究的荟萃分析。
痉挛(Ashworth 和改良 Ashworth 量表以及主观评估)、疼痛、膀胱功能障碍、不良事件以及因不良事件而退出。
分析了 17 项入选试验,共包括 3161 例患者。与安慰剂相比,大麻素疗效的显著发现是 SMD=-0.25 标准差(95%置信区间,-0.38 至-0.13 标准差),用于痉挛(主观患者评估数据)、-0.17 标准差(95%置信区间,-0.31 至-0.03 标准差)用于疼痛,以及-0.11 标准差(95%置信区间,-0.22 至-0.0008 标准差)用于膀胱功能障碍。结果有利于大麻素。在总不良事件分析中,耐受性的结果为 RR=1.72 人年(95%置信区间,1.46-2.02 人年),在因不良事件退出的分析中,RR=2.95 人年(95%置信区间,2.14-4.07 人年)。结果描述了大麻素的风险更高。严重不良事件荟萃分析未显示统计学意义。
结果表明,大麻素治疗多发性硬化症患者痉挛、疼痛和膀胱功能障碍的疗效有限。使用这些药物的治疗可被认为是安全的。
PROSPERO 标识符:CRD42014015391。