Kittipibul Veraprapas, Xanthopoulos Andrew, Hurst Thomas E, Fukamachi Kiyotaka, Blackstone Eugene H, Soltesz Edward, Starling Randall C
From the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Kaufman Center for Heart Failure, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
ASAIO J. 2020 Feb;66(2):153-159. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000952.
We observed different temporal patterns of HeartMate II left ventricular assist device (LVAD) thrombosis regarding clinical manifestations and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) trends. We propose nomenclature for classification of LVAD thrombosis and compare patient characteristics and outcomes in each pattern of LVAD thrombosis. We reviewed electronic medical records of 362 consecutive HeartMate II devices implanted at Cleveland Clinic from October 2008 to July 2014. We categorized clinical courses of confirmed device thrombosis based on clinical manifestations and LDH patterns. Patients' characteristics, clinical variables, and outcomes were collected for comparison. From a total of 19 confirmed device thromboses, we categorized the patterns of thrombosis into three distinctive types; abrupt thrombosis (Type 1), subacute thrombosis (Type 2), and asymptomatic hemolysis (Type 3). Abrupt thrombosis (Type 1) tended to be the most morbid clinical course with acute-onset thrombosis at 56.5 (interquartile range: 44-71) days, all New York Heart Association functional class III or IV at presentation. Death and need for surgical intervention were not different in each pattern. Asymptomatic hemolysis had unique comorbidities of preexisting cardiac thrombi and preoperative bacteremia. Confirmed LVAD thrombosis has different patterns of clinical presentation and each pattern of thrombosis has unique characteristics and clinical manifestations.
我们观察到HeartMate II左心室辅助装置(LVAD)血栓形成在临床表现和乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)变化趋势方面存在不同的时间模式。我们提出了LVAD血栓形成的分类命名法,并比较了每种LVAD血栓形成模式下患者的特征和预后。我们回顾了2008年10月至2014年7月在克利夫兰诊所连续植入的362例HeartMate II装置的电子病历。我们根据临床表现和LDH模式对确诊的装置血栓形成的临床过程进行了分类。收集患者的特征、临床变量和预后进行比较。在总共19例确诊的装置血栓形成中,我们将血栓形成模式分为三种不同类型:急性血栓形成(1型)、亚急性血栓形成(2型)和无症状溶血(3型)。急性血栓形成(1型)往往是最具病态的临床过程,血栓形成急性发作时间为56.5(四分位间距:44 - 71)天,所有患者就诊时纽约心脏协会心功能分级均为III级或IV级。每种模式下死亡和手术干预的需求没有差异。无症状溶血具有先前存在心脏血栓和术前菌血症的独特合并症。确诊的LVAD血栓形成有不同的临床表现模式,每种血栓形成模式都有独特的特征和临床表现。