Suppr超能文献

与全科医生的定期接触:改善与住院治疗有效关联的测量方法。

Regularity of contact with GPs: Measurement approaches to improve valid associations with hospitalization.

机构信息

Health Systems & Health Economics, School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.

School of Economics and Finance, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2019 Oct 8;36(5):650-656. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmz002.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies examine longitudinal continuity of GP contact though few consider 'regularity of GP contact', i.e., the dispersion of contacts over time. Increased regularity may indicate planned ongoing care. Current measures of regularity may be correlated with the number of contacts and may not isolate the phenomenon of interest.

OBJECTIVES

To compare two published and one newly developed regularity index in terms of their ability to measure regularity of GP contacts independently of the number of contacts and the impact on their association with hospitalization.

METHODS

A cohort at risk of diabetes-related hospitalization in Western Australia from 1990 to 2004 was identified using linked administrative data. For each regularity index, relationships with number of GP contacts were assessed. Hospitalization was then regressed on each index with and without number of contacts as a covariate.

RESULTS

Among 153,414 patients the new regularity index showed a reduced association with number of contacts compared with existing indices. Associations with hospitalization differed between measures; for previously published indices, there were no significant associations between regularity and hospitalization, whereas on the new index, most regular GP contact was associated with reduced hospitalization (IRR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.88-0.93). When number of contacts was added as a covariate, point estimates for this index showed little change, whereas for existing measures this addition changed point estimates.

CONCLUSION

A new measure of regularity of GP contact was less correlated with the number of contacts than previously published measures and better suited to estimating unconfounded relationships of regularity with hospitalization.

摘要

背景

有研究考察了全科医生(GP)就诊的纵向连续性,但很少有研究关注“GP 就诊的规律性”,即就诊时间的分布。就诊规律性的增加可能表明有计划性的持续治疗。目前的规律性衡量指标可能与就诊次数相关,且不一定能将关注的现象孤立出来。

目的

针对两项已发表的和一项新开发的规律性指数,比较它们在不考虑就诊次数的情况下衡量 GP 就诊规律性的能力,以及对其与住院治疗关联的影响。

方法

通过链接的行政数据,从 1990 年至 2004 年在西澳大利亚州确定了一个有糖尿病相关住院风险的队列。对于每个规律性指数,评估其与 GP 就诊次数的关系。然后,将住院情况作为协变量,回归分析每个指数与就诊次数的关系。

结果

在 153414 名患者中,新的规律性指数与就诊次数的关联度低于现有指数。这些指数与住院治疗的关联存在差异;对于之前发表的指数,规律性与住院治疗之间没有显著关联,而在新指数中,GP 就诊的规律性越高,住院治疗的可能性越低(IRR=0.90,95%CI=0.88-0.93)。当将就诊次数作为协变量添加时,该指数的点估计值变化不大,而对于现有指标,添加就诊次数会改变点估计值。

结论

与之前发表的指标相比,一种新的 GP 就诊规律性衡量指标与就诊次数的相关性较低,更适合估计规律性与住院治疗之间无混杂关系。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验