Research Center for Bioelectromagnetic Interaction (femu) - Institute for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Environ Res. 2019 Apr;171:247-259. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.01.015. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
Many novel technologies, including induction cookers or wireless power transfer, produce electric fields (EF), magnetic fields (MF) or electromagnetic fields (EMF) in the intermediate frequency (IF) range. The effects of such fields on biological systems, however, have been poorly investigated. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an update of the state of research and to evaluate the potential for adverse effects of EF, MF and EMF in the IF range (300 Hz to 1 MHz) on biological systems.
The review was prepared in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Methodical limitations in individual studies were assessed using the Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT) Risk of Bias Rating Tool for Human and Animal Studies.
Fifty-six studies exposing humans, animals or in vitro systems were eligible for this review. In these studies, many different endpoints were examined and most of the findings were obtained in studies with exposure to MF. For most endpoints, however, the reviewed studies yielded inconsistent results, with some studies indicating no effect and some linking IF exposure with adverse effects. In the majority of the included studies, the applied field strengths were above the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) reference levels for the general public and the applied frequencies were mainly below 100 kHz. Furthermore, many of the reviewed studies suffered from methodical limitations which lowered the credibility of the reported results.
Due to the large heterogeneity in study designs, endpoints and exposed systems, as well as the inconsistent results and methodical limitations in many studies, the quality of evidence for adverse effects remains inadequate for drawing a conclusion on investigated biological effects of IF fields for most endpoints. We recommend that in future studies, effects of EF, MF and EMF in the IF range should be investigated more systematically, i.e., studies should consider various frequencies to identify potential frequency-dependent effects and apply different field strengths, especially if threshold-dependent effects are expected. Priority should be given to the investigation of acute effects, like induction of phosphenes, perception, excitation of nerves or muscles and thermal effects. This would be an important step towards the validation of the reference levels recommended by ICNIRP. Furthermore, we recommend that any new studies aim at implementing high quality dosimetry and minimizing sources of risk of bias.
许多新型技术,包括电磁炉或无线电能传输,会在中频(IF)范围内产生电场(EF)、磁场(MF)或电磁场(EMF)。然而,这些场对生物系统的影响还研究得很少。本系统评价的目的是提供最新研究状况,并评估 IF 范围内(300Hz 至 1MHz)EF、MF 和 EMF 对生物系统产生不良影响的潜力。
本综述按照 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南进行准备。使用健康评估和翻译办公室(OHAT)的人类和动物研究风险偏倚评估工具,评估个别研究中的方法学局限性。
共有 56 项研究暴露于人类、动物或体外系统,符合本综述的条件。在这些研究中,检查了许多不同的终点,并且大多数发现都是在 MF 暴露研究中获得的。然而,对于大多数终点,审查研究的结果不一致,一些研究表明没有影响,一些研究则将 IF 暴露与不良影响联系起来。在大多数纳入的研究中,应用的场强高于国际非电离辐射防护委员会(ICNIRP)针对公众的参考水平,应用的频率主要低于 100kHz。此外,许多综述研究存在方法学局限性,降低了报告结果的可信度。
由于研究设计、终点和暴露系统的巨大异质性,以及许多研究结果不一致和方法学局限性,对于 IF 场的大多数终点的调查生物效应的不良影响的证据质量仍然不足,无法得出结论。我们建议,在未来的研究中,应更系统地研究 IF 范围内的 EF、MF 和 EMF 的影响,即研究应考虑各种频率,以确定潜在的频率相关效应,并应用不同的场强,特别是如果预期存在与阈值相关的效应。应优先研究急性效应,如光幻视的诱导、感知、神经或肌肉的兴奋和热效应。这将是验证 ICNIRP 推荐的参考水平的重要一步。此外,我们建议任何新的研究都应旨在实施高质量的剂量测定并最大限度地减少偏倚风险的来源。