Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany.
Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Mar;109:70-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.12.019. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains incurable in most cases, but survival has improved with advances in cytotoxic chemotherapy and targeted agents. However, the optimal use and sequencing of these agents across multiple lines of treatment is unclear. Here, we review current treatment approaches and optimal treatment sequencing across the first-, second- and third-line settings in mCRC, including biological aspects affecting sequencing and rechallenge. Effective first-line therapy is a key determinant of treatment outcomes and should be selected after considering both clinical factors and biological markers, notably RAS and BRAF. The second-line regimen choice depends on the systemic therapies given in first-line. Anti-angiogenic agents (e.g. bevacizumab, ramucirumab and aflibercept) are indicated for most patients, whereas epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors do not improve survival in the second-line setting. Molecular profiling is important in third-line treatment, with options in RAS wild-type patients including EGFR inhibitors (cetuximab or panitumumab), regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil. Immunotherapy with pembrolizumab or nivolumab ± ipilimumab may be considered for patients with high microsatellite instability disease. Targeting HER2/neu amplification shows promise for the subset of CRC tumours displaying this abnormality. Sequencing decisions are complicated by the potential for any treatment break or de-escalation to evoke a distinct clinical progression type. Ongoing trials are investigating the optimal sequencing and timing of therapies for mCRC. Molecular profiling has established new targets, and increasing knowledge of tumour evolution under drug pressure will possibly impact on sequencing.
转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)在大多数情况下仍然无法治愈,但随着细胞毒性化疗和靶向药物的进步,其生存率有所提高。然而,在多条治疗线上最佳使用和排序这些药物仍不清楚。在这里,我们回顾了 mCRC 一线、二线和三线治疗中当前的治疗方法和最佳治疗排序,包括影响排序和再挑战的生物学方面。有效的一线治疗是治疗结果的关键决定因素,应在考虑临床因素和生物学标志物(尤其是 RAS 和 BRAF)后选择。二线方案的选择取决于一线使用的系统治疗药物。抗血管生成药物(如贝伐珠单抗、雷莫芦单抗和阿柏西普)适用于大多数患者,而表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)抑制剂在二线治疗中并不能提高生存率。分子谱分析在三线治疗中很重要,RAS 野生型患者的选择包括 EGFR 抑制剂(西妥昔单抗或帕尼单抗)、瑞戈非尼和三氟尿苷/替匹嘧啶。对于高微卫星不稳定性疾病患者,可考虑使用 pembrolizumab 或 nivolumab ± ipilimumab 进行免疫治疗。针对 HER2/neu 扩增的靶向治疗显示出对具有这种异常的结直肠癌肿瘤亚群的前景。治疗中断或降级可能会引发不同的临床进展类型,这使得排序决策变得复杂。正在进行的试验正在研究 mCRC 的最佳治疗排序和时机。分子谱分析已经确定了新的靶点,并且对药物压力下肿瘤进化的了解不断增加,可能会对排序产生影响。
Eur J Cancer. 2019-1-25
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2016-1
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018-11-16
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2020-9
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2024-5
Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2025
World J Clin Oncol. 2025-6-24
Front Pharmacol. 2025-3-25