Suppr超能文献

MEESSI 急性心力衰竭风险评分的外部验证:一项队列研究。

External Validation of the MEESSI Acute Heart Failure Risk Score: A Cohort Study.

机构信息

University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland (D.W., N.K., J.W., I.S., L.S., P.B., R.T., K.W., C.P., J.D., S.S., O.S., D.F., T.N., J.B., C.S., O.P., T.B., C.M.).

University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland, and Spital Linth, Uznach, Switzerland (Z.S.).

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2019 Feb 19;170(4):248-256. doi: 10.7326/M18-1967. Epub 2019 Jan 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The MEESSI-AHF (Multiple Estimation of risk based on the Emergency department Spanish Score In patients with AHF) score was developed to predict 30-day mortality in patients presenting with acute heart failure (AHF) to emergency departments (EDs) in Spain. Whether it performs well in other countries is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To externally validate the MEESSI-AHF score in another country.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01831115).

SETTING

Multicenter recruitment of dyspneic patients presenting to the ED.

PARTICIPANTS

The external validation cohort included 1572 patients with AHF.

MEASUREMENTS

Calculation of the MEESSI-AHF score using an established model containing 12 independent risk factors.

RESULTS

Among 1572 patients with adjudicated AHF, 1247 had complete data that allowed calculation of the MEESSI-AHF score. Of these, 102 (8.2%) died within 30 days. The score predicted 30-day mortality with excellent discrimination (c-statistic, 0.80). Assessment of cumulative mortality showed a steep gradient in 30-day mortality over 6 predefined risk groups (0 patients in the lowest-risk group vs. 35 [28.5%] in the highest-risk group). Risk was overestimated in the high-risk groups, resulting in a Hosmer-Lemeshow P value of 0.022. However, after adjustment of the intercept, the model showed good concordance between predicted risks and observed outcomes (P = 0.23). Findings were confirmed in sensitivity analyses that used multiple imputation for missing values in the overall cohort of 1572 patients.

LIMITATIONS

External validation was done using a reduced model. Findings are specific to patients with AHF who present to the ED and are clinically stable enough to provide informed consent. Performance in patients with terminal kidney failure who are receiving long-term dialysis cannot be commented on.

CONCLUSION

External validation of the MEESSI-AHF risk score showed excellent discrimination. Recalibration may be needed when the score is introduced to new populations.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

The European Union, the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Swiss Heart Foundation, the Cardiovascular Research Foundation Basel, the University of Basel, and University Hospital Basel.

摘要

背景

MEESSI-AHF(基于西班牙急性心力衰竭急诊科评分的风险多因素评估)评分是为了预测在西班牙急诊科就诊的急性心力衰竭(AHF)患者的 30 天死亡率而开发的。该评分在其他国家的表现如何尚不清楚。

目的

在另一个国家外部验证 MEESSI-AHF 评分。

设计

前瞻性队列研究。(ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT01831115)。

地点

多中心招募呼吸困难患者至急诊科。

参与者

外部验证队列纳入了 1572 例 AHF 患者。

测量

使用包含 12 个独立危险因素的既定模型计算 MEESSI-AHF 评分。

结果

在 1572 例经判定的 AHF 患者中,有 1247 例有完整数据可计算 MEESSI-AHF 评分。其中,102 例(8.2%)在 30 天内死亡。该评分对 30 天死亡率具有良好的区分能力(c 统计量,0.80)。累积死亡率评估显示,在 6 个预先设定的风险组中,30 天死亡率呈陡峭梯度(最低风险组中无患者 vs. 最高风险组中 35 例[28.5%])。高风险组的风险估计过高,导致 Hosmer-Lemeshow P 值为 0.022。然而,调整截距后,该模型显示预测风险与观察结果之间具有良好的一致性(P=0.23)。在使用对 1572 例患者的总体队列中的缺失值进行多重插补的敏感性分析中,得到了类似的结果。

局限性

外部验证是使用简化模型进行的。研究结果仅适用于就诊于急诊科且临床状况稳定足以提供知情同意的 AHF 患者。无法对接受长期透析的终末期肾衰竭患者的表现进行评论。

结论

MEESSI-AHF 风险评分的外部验证显示出良好的区分能力。当将评分引入新人群时,可能需要重新校准。

主要资金来源

欧盟、瑞士国家科学基金会、瑞士心脏基金会、巴塞尔心血管研究基金会、巴塞尔大学和巴塞尔大学附属医院。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验