Digital Cultures & Societies, University of Queensland, Mianjin/Brisbane, Spain.
Emergency Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Intern Emerg Med. 2023 Jun;18(4):1159-1168. doi: 10.1007/s11739-023-03197-9. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
Short stay unit (SSU) is an alternative to conventional hospitalization in patients with acute heart failure (AHF), but the prognosis is not known compared to direct discharge from the emergency department (ED). To determine whether direct discharge from the ED of patients diagnosed with AHF is associated with early adverse outcomes versus hospitalization in SSU. Endpoints, defined as 30-day all-cause mortality or post-discharge adverse events, were evaluated in patients diagnosed with AHF in 17 Spanish EDs with an SSU, and compared by ED discharge vs. SSU hospitalization. Endpoint risk was adjusted for baseline and AHF episode characteristics and in patients matched by propensity score (PS) for SSU hospitalization. Overall, 2358 patients were discharged home and 2003 were hospitalized in SSUs. Discharged patients were younger, more frequently men, with fewer comorbidities, had better baseline status, less infection, rapid atrial fibrillation and hypertensive emergency as the AHF trigger, and had a lower severity of AHF episode. While their 30-day mortality rate was lower than in patients hospitalized in SSU (4.4% vs. 8.1%, p < 0.001), 30-day post-discharge adverse events were similar (27.2% vs. 28.4%, p = 0.599). After adjustment, there were no differences in the 30-day risk of mortality of discharged patients (adjusted HR 0.846, 95% CI 0.637-1.107) or adverse events (1.035, 0.914-1.173). In 337 pairs of PS-matched patients, there were no differences in mortality or risk of adverse event between patients directly discharged or admitted to an SSU (0.753, 0.409-1.397; and 0.858, 0.645-1.142; respectively). Direct ED discharge of patients diagnosed with AHF provides similar outcomes compared to patients with similar characteristics and hospitalized in a SSU.
短期留观病房(SSU)是急性心力衰竭(AHF)患者替代传统住院治疗的一种选择,但与直接从急诊科(ED)出院相比,其预后尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定直接从 ED 出院与在 SSU 住院治疗的 AHF 患者相比,是否与早期不良结局相关。在 17 家设有 SSU 的西班牙 ED 中诊断为 AHF 的患者中评估了 30 天全因死亡率或出院后不良事件等终点,并通过 ED 出院与 SSU 住院进行了比较。通过对基线和 AHF 发作特征以及通过 SSU 住院倾向评分(PS)匹配的患者进行调整,评估了终点风险。总体而言,2358 名患者出院回家,2003 名患者住院于 SSU。出院患者更年轻,更多为男性,合并症更少,基线状态更好,感染更少,快速性心房颤动和高血压急症作为 AHF 诱因更常见,AHF 发作严重程度更低。尽管他们的 30 天死亡率低于 SSU 住院患者(4.4% vs. 8.1%,p < 0.001),但 30 天出院后不良事件发生率相似(27.2% vs. 28.4%,p = 0.599)。调整后,出院患者 30 天死亡率(调整后 HR 0.846,95%CI 0.637-1.107)或不良事件风险(1.035,0.914-1.173)均无差异。在 337 对 PS 匹配的患者中,直接出院或收入 SSU 的患者在死亡率或不良事件风险方面无差异(0.753,0.409-1.397;0.858,0.645-1.142)。直接 ED 出院的 AHF 患者与住院于 SSU 的具有相似特征和结局的患者相比,结局相似。