Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Med Educ. 2019 Jul;53(7):666-676. doi: 10.1111/medu.13803. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
Competency-based medical education (CBME) is becoming widely implemented in medical education. Trainees' perceptions of CBME are important factors in the implementation and acceptance of CBME. Online discussion groups allow unique insight into trainees' perceptions of CBME during residency training.
We analysed 867 posts from 20 discussion threads in Premed 101 (Canadian) and 2756 posts from 50 threads in Student Doctor Network (SDN) (American) using NVivo 11. Inductive content analysis was used to develop a data-driven coding scheme that evolved throughout the analysis. Measures were taken to ensure the trustworthiness of findings, including co-coding of a subsample of 600 posts, peer debriefing, consensus-based analytical decision making and the maintenance of an audit trial.
Medical residents and students participating in the discussion forums emphasised select themes regarding the implementation of CBME in residency training. Concerns about CBME in Canada primarily involved its implications for the length of residency and post-residency opportunities. Posts on the American forum had a prominent focus on differing areas, such as the subjectivity in the assessment of core competencies and the role of CBME in termination of a resident's position.
Online discussion groups have the potential to provide unique insight into perceptions of CBME. The presented concerns may have implications for refining the model of CBME and illustrate the importance of providing clarification for trainees regarding length of training and evaluation structures from those involved in designing of CBME programmes.
以能力为基础的医学教育(CBME)在医学教育中得到了广泛的应用。学员对 CBME 的看法是 CBME 实施和接受的重要因素。在线讨论组允许深入了解学员在住院医师培训期间对 CBME 的看法。
我们使用 NVivo 11 分析了 Premed 101(加拿大)的 20 个讨论线程中的 867 个帖子和 Student Doctor Network(SDN)(美国)的 50 个线程中的 2756 个帖子。采用归纳内容分析法制定了一个数据驱动的编码方案,该方案在分析过程中不断发展。采取了措施确保研究结果的可信度,包括对 600 个帖子的副编码、同行汇报、基于共识的分析决策以及审核记录的维护。
参与讨论论坛的住院医师和医学生强调了在住院医师培训中实施 CBME 的一些主题。加拿大对 CBME 的担忧主要涉及对住院医师培训时间和毕业后机会的影响。美国论坛上的帖子则主要关注不同的领域,例如核心能力评估的主观性以及 CBME 在终止住院医师职位方面的作用。
在线讨论组有可能提供对 CBME 看法的独特见解。所提出的担忧可能对完善 CBME 模式具有启示意义,并说明了为参与 CBME 项目设计的人员提供关于培训时间和评估结构的澄清的重要性。