Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
J Orthop Res. 2019 Mar;37(3):640-648. doi: 10.1002/jor.24237. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
Patellofemoral (PF) osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent and clinically important knee OA subgroup. Malalignment may be an important risk factor for PF OA. However, little is known about alignment in PF OA, particularly in an upright, weightbearing environment. Using a vertically-oriented open-bore MR scanner, we evaluated 3D knee alignment in 15 PF OA cases and 15 individually matched asymptomatic controls. We imaged one knee per participant while they stood two-legged at four flexion angles (0°, 15°, 30°, 45°), and also while they stood one-legged at 30° knee flexion. We calculated 3D patellofemoral and tibiofemoral alignment. Using mixed effects models, four of the five patellofemoral measures differed by group. For key measures, PF OA patellae were 6.6° [95%CI 5.0, 8.2] more laterally tilted, 2.4 mm [1.3, 3.5] more laterally translated, and at least 3.7 mm [0.2, 7.2] more proximally translated compared to controls (more with knees flexed). Alignment did not differ between two-legged stance and one-legged stance in either group. Statement of Clinical Significance: Our study demonstrated significant and clinically relevant differences in alignment between PF OA cases and controls in upright standing and squatting positions. Our findings were similar to those in previous studies of PF OA using traditional MR scanners in supine positions, supporting the clinical usefulness of existing methods aimed at identifying individuals who may benefit from interventions designed to correct malalignment. © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Orthopaedic Research® Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the Orthopaedic Research Society. 9999:1-9, 2019.
髌股(PF)骨关节炎(OA)是一种常见且具有临床重要意义的膝关节 OA 亚组。对线不良可能是 PF OA 的一个重要危险因素。然而,对于 PF OA 的对线情况,特别是在垂直、负重的环境下,我们知之甚少。我们使用垂直定向的开磁孔 MR 扫描仪,评估了 15 例 PF OA 病例和 15 例个体匹配的无症状对照者的 3D 膝关节对线情况。每位参与者在双腿站立于 4 个屈曲角度(0°、15°、30°、45°)时对一侧膝关节成像,在单腿站立于 30°膝关节屈曲时对另一侧膝关节成像。我们计算了 3D 髌股和胫股对线。使用混合效应模型,有 5 项髌股测量中有 4 项在组间存在差异。对于关键测量,PF OA 髌骨的外侧倾斜度大 6.6°[95%CI 5.0,8.2],外侧平移 2.4mm[1.3,3.5],并且相对于对照组,髌骨近端平移至少 3.7mm[0.2,7.2](膝关节屈曲时更多)。在两组中,双腿站立和单腿站立的对线没有差异。临床意义声明:我们的研究在直立和深蹲姿势中,PF OA 病例与对照组之间的对线存在显著且具有临床意义的差异。我们的发现与之前使用仰卧位传统 MR 扫描仪研究 PF OA 的研究结果相似,支持了现有方法的临床实用性,这些方法旨在识别可能受益于纠正对线不良的干预措施的个体。