Kaiser Elias, Ouzounis Theoharis, Giday Habtamu, Schipper Rachel, Heuvelink Ep, Marcelis Leo F M
Horticulture and Product Physiology Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Jan 14;9:2002. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.02002. eCollection 2018.
Greenhouse crop production in northern countries often relies heavily on supplemental lighting for year-round yield and product quality. Among the different spectra used in supplemental lighting, red is often considered the most efficient, but plants do not develop normally when grown solely under monochromatic red light ("red light syndrome"). Addition of blue light has been shown to aid normal development, and typical lighting spectra in greenhouse production include a mixture of red and blue light. However, it is unclear whether sunlight, as part of the light available to plants in the greenhouse, may be sufficient as a source of blue light. In a greenhouse high-wire tomato (), we varied the percentage of blue supplemental light (in a red background) as 0, 6, 12, and 24%, while keeping total photosynthetically active radiation constant. Light was supplied as a mixture of overhead (99 μmol m s) and intracanopy (48 μmol m s) LEDs, together with sunlight. Averaged over the whole experiment (111 days), sunlight comprised 58% of total light incident onto the crop. Total biomass, yield and number of fruits increased with the addition of blue light to an optimum, suggesting that both low (0%) and high (24%) blue light intensities were suboptimal for growth. Stem and internode lengths, as well as leaf area, decreased with increases in blue light percentage. While photosynthetic capacity increased linearly with increases in blue light percentage, photosynthesis in the low blue light treatment (0%) was not low enough to suggest the occurrence of the red light syndrome. Decreased biomass at low (0%) blue light was likely caused by decreased photosynthetic light use efficiency. Conversely, decreased biomass at high (24%) blue light was likely caused by reductions in canopy light interception. We conclude that while it is not strictly necessary to add blue light to greenhouse supplemental red light to obtain a functional crop, adding some (6-12%) blue light is advantageous for growth and yield while adding 24% blue light is suboptimal for growth.
北方国家的温室作物生产通常严重依赖补光来实现全年产量和产品质量。在补光使用的不同光谱中,红光通常被认为是最有效的,但植物仅在单色红光下生长时无法正常发育(“红光综合征”)。添加蓝光已被证明有助于正常发育,温室生产中的典型光谱包括红光和蓝光的混合。然而,尚不清楚作为温室中植物可用光一部分的阳光是否足以作为蓝光来源。在一个温室高架番茄种植中,我们将补蓝光的百分比(在红色背景下)设置为0%、6%、12%和24%,同时保持光合有效辐射总量不变。光由顶部(99 μmol m² s⁻¹)和冠层内(48 μmol m² s⁻¹)的发光二极管混合提供,再加上阳光。在整个实验(111天)中平均计算,阳光占照射到作物上的总光量的58%。总生物量、产量和果实数量随着蓝光的添加增加到一个最佳值,这表明低(0%)和高(24%)蓝光强度对生长都不是最适宜的。茎和节间长度以及叶面积随着蓝光百分比的增加而减小。虽然光合能力随着蓝光百分比的增加呈线性增加,但低蓝光处理(0%)下的光合作用并不低到足以表明出现了红光综合征。低(0%)蓝光下生物量的减少可能是由于光合光利用效率降低所致。相反,高(24%)蓝光下生物量的减少可能是由于冠层光截获减少所致。我们得出结论,虽然在温室补光中添加蓝光并非严格必要就能获得功能正常的作物,但添加一些(6 - 12%)蓝光对生长和产量有利,而添加24%蓝光对生长并非最适宜。