Department of Biomedical Engineering , University of North Texas , Denton , Texas 76207 , United States.
Nancy E and Peter C. Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering , Cornell University , New York 14853 , United States.
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019 Feb 20;11(7):6809-6819. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b20634. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
Zn-based biomaterials have emerged as promising new types of bioresorbable metallics applicable to orthopedic devices, cardiovascular stents, and other medical applications recently. Compared to other degradable metallic biomaterials (i.e., Mg- or Fe-based), Zn biomaterials have a more appropriate corrosion rate without hydrogen gas evolution. Here, we evaluated the potential of Zn-based metallics as medical implants, both in vitro and in vivo, alongside a standard benchmark Mg alloy, AZ31. The mechanical properties of the pure Zn were not strong enough but were significantly enhanced (microhardness > 70 kg/mm, strength > 220 MPa, elongation > 15%) after alloying with Sr or Mg (1.5 at. %), surpassing the minimal design criteria for load-bearing device applications. The corrosion rate of Zn-based biomaterials was about 0.4 mm/year, significantly slower than that of AZ31. The measured cell viability and proliferation of three different human primary cells fared better for Zn-based biomaterials than AZ31 using both direct and indirect culture methods. Platelet adhesion and activation on Zn-based materials were minimal, significantly less than on AZ31. The hemolysis ratio of red cells (<0.5%) after incubation with Zn-based materials was also well below the ISO standard of 5%. Moreover, Zn-based biomaterials promoted stem cell differentiation to induce the extracellular matrix mineralization process. In addition, in vivo animal testing using subcutaneous, bone, and vascular implantations revealed that the acute toxicity and immune response of Zn-based biomaterials were minimal/moderate, comparable to that of AZ31. No extensive cell death and foreign body reactions were observed. Taken together, Zn-based biomaterials may have a great potential as promising candidates for medical implants.
近年来,锌基生物材料作为有前途的新型可生物吸收金属材料,已应用于骨科器械、心血管支架等医疗领域。与其他可降解金属生物材料(如镁或铁基)相比,锌生物材料具有更合适的腐蚀速率,且不会产生氢气。在此,我们评估了锌基金属作为医疗植入物的潜力,包括体外和体内实验,并与标准的镁合金 AZ31 进行了比较。纯锌的机械性能不够强,但与 Sr 或 Mg(1.5 原子%)合金化后显著增强(显微硬度>70kg/mm,强度>220MPa,伸长率>15%),超过了承载设备应用的最小设计标准。锌基生物材料的腐蚀速率约为 0.4mm/年,明显慢于 AZ31。使用直接和间接培养方法,三种不同的人原代细胞的细胞活力和增殖在锌基生物材料上的测量结果优于 AZ31。血小板在锌基材料上的黏附和激活较少,明显少于 AZ31。与 AZ31 相比,孵育后红细胞的溶血率(<0.5%)也远低于 ISO 标准的 5%。此外,锌基生物材料还能促进干细胞分化,诱导细胞外基质矿化过程。此外,皮下、骨和血管植入的体内动物实验表明,锌基生物材料的急性毒性和免疫反应轻微/中度,与 AZ31 相当。未观察到广泛的细胞死亡和异物反应。综上所述,锌基生物材料作为有前途的医疗植入物候选材料具有很大的潜力。