Suppr超能文献

创伤性脑损伤后药物干预概述:对选定结局的影响

Overview of pharmacological interventions after traumatic brain injuries: impact on selected outcomes.

作者信息

Kim Sonya, Mortera Marianne, Hu Xiaolei, Krishnan Shilpa, Hoffecker Lilian, Herrold Amy, Terhorst Lauren, King Laurie, Machtinger Joseph, Zumsteg Jennifer M, Negm Ahmed, Heyn Patricia

机构信息

a Department of Neurology and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine , NYU School of Medicine , New York , USA.

b NYU Steinhardt, Department of Occupational Therapy , New York University , New York , USA.

出版信息

Brain Inj. 2019;33(4):442-455. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2019.1565896. Epub 2019 Jan 29.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to conduct an overview of systematic reviews (SRs) to appraise the published evidence related to pharmacological interventions after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Searches were conducted with Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, PubMed. 780 retrieved SRs underwent a two-level screening to determine inclusion. Data extracted included participant characteristics, TBI severity, study design, pharmacological interventions, and outcomes. SRs were assessed for methodological quality by using the AMSTAR measurement tool. After removing duplicates, 166/780 SRs published between 1990-2017 were reviewed, 62 of which met inclusion criteria. More than 90 drugs and 22 substance-classes were extracted. Most medications were administered during the acute stage. Mild TBI was included in 3% of the SRs. Physiological outcomes comprised 45% of the SRs, primarily mortality. Activities of daily living (ADLs) outcomes constituted 22% of the SRs followed by cognition (13%) and psychological/behavioral outcomes (13%). Only 7% of the SRs assessed adverse events. Inconsistencies in definitions, methods, and heterogeneity of instruments used to measure treatment response were noted. Only a third of the SRs had high methodological quality. Most SRs had heterogeneous TBI samples, outcomes, or methodologies making it difficult to synthesize findings into recommended guidelines. This study demonstrated a need for adequately powered and rigorous randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to provide generalizable evidence on the effectiveness of pharmacologic interventions for TBI. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42015017355.

摘要

本研究的目的是对系统评价(SRs)进行综述,以评估与创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后药物干预相关的已发表证据。通过检索Medline、Embase、PsycINFO、Web of Science、PubMed进行搜索。对检索到的780篇SRs进行了两级筛选以确定纳入情况。提取的数据包括参与者特征、TBI严重程度、研究设计、药物干预和结果。使用AMSTAR测量工具对SRs的方法学质量进行评估。去除重复项后,对1990年至2017年间发表的166/780篇SRs进行了综述,其中62篇符合纳入标准。提取了90多种药物和22种物质类别。大多数药物在急性期给药。3%的SRs纳入了轻度TBI。生理结果占SRs的45%,主要是死亡率。日常生活活动(ADL)结果占SRs的22%,其次是认知(13%)和心理/行为结果(13%)。只有7%的SRs评估了不良事件。注意到用于测量治疗反应的定义、方法和工具的异质性方面存在不一致。只有三分之一的SRs具有较高的方法学质量。大多数SRs的TBI样本、结果或方法存在异质性,难以将研究结果综合成推荐指南。本研究表明需要有足够样本量和严格的随机临床试验(RCTs),以提供关于TBI药物干预有效性的可推广证据。PROSPERO注册号:CRD42015017355。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验